Wireshark-dev: Re: [Wireshark-dev] How to add ilbc library to wireshark CMake?
From: João Valverde <joao.valverde@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 29 Dec 2019 21:16:04 +0000


On 29/12/19 20:46, Roland Knall wrote:
The way here would be to push your patch to gerrit. iLBC seems to be distributed (at least the codec as part of the WebRTC project) with a BSD-Style license, so integration should be doable. Please also check, beside tools/debian-setup.sh there are scripts in there for other Linux distributions as well, which have to be adapted, as well as the before mentioned macOS-brew script.


This doesn't seem to be available in vanilla Debian/Ubuntu (only deb-multimedia.org) so I think you are out of luck there, unless you can find a Debian maintainer interested in adopting this library.


Am So., 29. Dez. 2019 um 21:15 Uhr schrieb João Valverde <joao.valverde@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:


On 29/12/19 13:46, Jiří Novák wrote:
> Hi,
>
>> For Ubuntu there is tools/debian-setup.sh that installs optional
>> packages (as this).
>> I suggest you to test your change at least on this platform since it's
>> the most common.
> OK. I will try.
>
>> Did you make your change compilable without that library? You need some
>> preprocessor ifdefs for that.
> I'm familiar with optional compilation with configure tools, but I'm
> lost in CMake... On the other hand I tested it and it is possible to
> compile it without library - CMake detects it is not there and do not
> compile the code. Therefore it looks I wrote it correctly.
>
> BTW I have no idea where to get iLBC library for Windows and Mac. The
> library is open source therefore we can try to compile it, but I don't
> know how to incorporate this step/procedure to build of wireshark.
>
> Redhat like systems use version 1.1.1 from 2012 but many other platforms
> use latest 2.0.2 from 2014.
>
>> If you push your change as WIP you can add me as reviewer: I have a
>> bunch of builders for many platforms. I can help you at least to compile
>> it on as many as possible.
> OK, thank you for offer. I'm waiting for accepting a few changes it
> depends on and then I will push it.
>

I think it would be helpful to push it anyway (your call). It will speed
up the review of the pending patches and make it easier for us to help.

Marking it [WIP] or [DONOTCOMMIT] is a good idea in case it doesn't show
a merge conflict (so it doesn't get merged ahead of the dependencies).
___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Archives:    https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
             mailto:wireshark-dev-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe

___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Archives:    https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
             mailto:wireshark-dev-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe