Thus wrote Tyson Key (tyson.key@xxxxxxxxx):
> Hi Gerald,
> Although the USB CCID, and packet-rfid-* dissectors invoke others to do payload dissection, I believe that the unused dissector table registration code was a left-over from initial design attempts - so it's probably safe to remove it.
> I hope that helps,
Ok, I removed the unused dissector tables in r53977.
Regards,
Martin
> Tyson.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Gerald Combs <gerald@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sender: wireshark-dev-bounces@wireshark.orgDate: Thu, 12 Dec 2013 09:03:57
> To: Developer support list for Wireshark<wireshark-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Reply-To: Developer support list for Wireshark <wireshark-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: [Wireshark-dev] Unused dissector tables
> The following dissectors create dissector tables but don't appear to use
> them:
> packet-aim.c
> packet-fcp.c
> packet-rfid-mifare.c
> packet-rfid-pn532.c
> packet-rsvp.c
> packet-usb-ccid.c
> Should the registration code be disabled or removed?
> ___________________________________________________________________________
> Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
> Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
> mailto:wireshark-dev-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe
> ___________________________________________________________________________
> Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
> Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
> mailto:wireshark-dev-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe
