Wireshark-dev: Re: [Wireshark-dev] Unused dissector tables
Date Index · Thread Index · Other Months · All Mailing Lists
Date Prev · Date Next · Thread Prev · Thread Next
From: "Tyson Key" <tyson.key@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 12 Dec 2013 17:14:55 +0000
Hi Gerald,

Although the USB CCID, and packet-rfid-* dissectors invoke others to do payload dissection, I believe that the unused dissector table registration code was a left-over from initial design attempts - so it's probably safe to remove it.

I hope that helps,

Tyson.
-----Original Message-----
From: Gerald Combs <gerald@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: wireshark-dev-bounces@wireshark.orgDate: Thu, 12 Dec 2013 09:03:57 
To: Developer support list for Wireshark<wireshark-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-To: Developer support list for Wireshark <wireshark-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [Wireshark-dev] Unused dissector tables

The following dissectors create dissector tables but don't appear to use
them:

packet-aim.c
packet-fcp.c
packet-rfid-mifare.c
packet-rfid-pn532.c
packet-rsvp.c
packet-usb-ccid.c

Should the registration code be disabled or removed?
___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
             mailto:wireshark-dev-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe