On Sun, Dec 08, 2013 at 09:23:23PM +0200, Kaul wrote:
> Thanks for the automated build links - I guess I'll watch them more closely
> and only sync when my platform passes.
>
> Interesting - I'm pulling from trunk and still fail on that. Perhaps it
> wasn't fixed entirely, or I have to do some cleanup?
I agree, it isn't fixed, from_hex() is defined inside:
#if defined(HAVE_LIBGNUTLS) && defined(HAVE_LIBGCRYPT)
but it's used outside this #ifdef.
Kuba.
>
>
> On Sun, Dec 8, 2013 at 6:51 PM, Hauke Mehrtens <hauke@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > On 12/08/2013 04:30 PM, Kaul wrote:
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > I've been trying to enhance a specific dissector for two weeks now.
> > > Since I'm afraid of diverging the code (although I'm working on a
> > > specific dissector), I update my code base often (~ once a day).
> > > Regretfully, 5 times (in 2 weeks!) this has resulted in compilation
> > failure.
> > > I'm pretty sure (subjectively) this hasn't happened in the past. Any
> > > measures we can put (continuous build system?) in place to prevent this?
> > >
> > > Today's failure (2nd failure only today btw):
> > > make[5]: Entering directory `/home/yanivk/wireshark/epan/dissectors'
> > > CC libdissectors_la-packet-ssl-utils.lo
> > > packet-ssl-utils.c: In function 'ssl_keylog_parse_session_id':
> > > packet-ssl-utils.c:4201:9: error: implicit declaration of function
> > > 'from_hex_char' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
> > > if (from_hex_char(line[2*i]) !=
> > > (ssl_session->session_id.data[i] >> 4) ||
> > > ^
> > > packet-ssl-utils.c:4218:5: error: implicit declaration of function
> > > 'from_hex' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
> > > if (!from_hex(&ssl_session->master_secret, line, len))
> > > ^
> > > cc1: all warnings being treated as errors
> > > make[5]: *** [libdissectors_la-packet-ssl-utils.lo] Error 1
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Y.
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > There are automated build, they are described here:
> > http://www.wireshark.org/docs/wsdg_html_chunked/ChIntroAutomated.html
> >
> > The last build results are here:
> > http://buildbot.wireshark.org/trunk/one_line_per_build
> >
> > The problem you current have was already fixed in current trunk some
> > hours ago.
> >
> > Hauke
> >
> ___________________________________________________________________________
> Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
> Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
> mailto:wireshark-dev-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe
