I have been happily using ethereal on a Linux box for a couple
of months now, and I have just recently noticed a couple of issues
which I would need an idea on how to approach them:
1. I needed to "catch" a file transfer error (FTP process)
resulting in incomplete file transfer (as you know, file transfer are
reported as "success" 226 regardless of whether the file made it
completely or not!) . Unfortunately this doesn't happen on a regular
basis, so I had no other choice than getting a large disk capable
Linux box, and run and save each day the ethereal trace. After
having re-visited a couple of traces, I was very surprised to see that
some of them didn't contain the whole day worth of data but only a
couple of hours, , while other days it worked just fine! So - my
question is: is there any problem in ethereal which would keep it
from recording continuously, other than disk space or memory
(which I have plentiful of both)? Any idea on how to figure out why
ethereal doesn't "keep" all the data?
2.Not really ethereal -> tcpdump (perhaps libcap) involved here:
having to leave in a switched only environment, I had to place
another machine I was supposed to "watch" on a Netgear 10/100
hub, so that I place my ethereal box on another hub port. When
running either ethereal (or tcpdump) I could "see" only ARP and
UDP packets, and the only TCP packets showing up would be if I
would initiate TCP communication from the ethereal box to the one
I want to capture - all other TCP traffic from/to this "captured" box
doesn't show up. Thinking I have a problem with port speed,
autonegotiation, the fact that the watched box had only 10 Mbps
card, my laptop with Linux had 10/100 Mbps "autonegotiatable"
only (those PCMCIA cards do not come with capability of fixing the
speed any more), I changed the Netgear 10/100 with a Cabletron
10 Mbps only hub - and guess what? I started "seeing" all the
traffic!!! Anybody having an explanation for this (as I didn't think that
port speed would have anything to do with hub (in regards to all
ports seeing each one's traffic) functionality, right?)
TIA,
Stef
P.S. I apologize for the lengthy message ... couldn't say it in fewer
words :-(
