On Sat, 24 Dec 2005, Joerg Mayer wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 23, 2005 at 05:36:22PM +0100, Jaap Keuter wrote:
> > Found some additional BOOTP options in a PPP trace. Deep down in the
> > Microsoft Windows Server 2003 TechCenter I found their meaning:
> > http://www.microsoft.com/technet/prodtechnol/windowsserver2003/library/TechRef/8006f246-2029-4bad-b9f0-4f31a56b0590.mspx
> > http://www.microsoft.com/technet/prodtechnol/windowsserver2003/library/TechRef/a70f1bb7-d2d4-49f0-96d6-4b7414ecfaae.mspx
> > Option 249 for classless static routes and option 252 for proxy
> > autodiscovery.
> > The attached patch adds them to the list in the BOOTP dissector.
> ...
> > + /* 248 */ { "Private", opaque, NULL },
> > + /* 249 */ { "Classless static routes", opaque, NULL },
> > + /* 250 */ { "Private", opaque, NULL },
> > + /* 251 */ { "Private", opaque, NULL },
> > + /* 252 */ { "Proxy autodiscovery", string, NULL },
> > + /* 253 */ { "Private", opaque, NULL },
> ...
>
> Is this really correct? Or should these options only be dissected this
> way if the vendor code is M$?
I found 249 in a normal parameter reqeuest list. When looking for its
meaning I stumbled upon 252 as well. The referenced docs speak of vendor
extensions, but not for these codes.
Thanx
Jaap
