Ethereal-dev: Re: [Ethereal-dev] Additional BOOTP options [PATCH]

Note: This archive is from the project's previous web site, ethereal.com. This list is no longer active.

Date Index Thread Index Other Months All Mailing Lists
Date Prev Date Next Thread Prev Thread Next
From: Joerg Mayer <jmayer@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 24 Dec 2005 03:51:14 +0100
On Fri, Dec 23, 2005 at 05:36:22PM +0100, Jaap Keuter wrote:
> Found some additional BOOTP options in a PPP trace. Deep down in the
> Microsoft Windows Server 2003 TechCenter I found their meaning:
> http://www.microsoft.com/technet/prodtechnol/windowsserver2003/library/TechRef/8006f246-2029-4bad-b9f0-4f31a56b0590.mspx
> http://www.microsoft.com/technet/prodtechnol/windowsserver2003/library/TechRef/a70f1bb7-d2d4-49f0-96d6-4b7414ecfaae.mspx
> Option 249 for classless static routes and option 252 for proxy
> autodiscovery.
> The attached patch adds them to the list in the BOOTP dissector.
...
> +		/* 248 */ { "Private",					opaque, NULL },
> +		/* 249 */ { "Classless static routes",			opaque, NULL },
> +		/* 250 */ { "Private",					opaque, NULL },
> +		/* 251 */ { "Private",					opaque, NULL },
> +		/* 252 */ { "Proxy autodiscovery",			string, NULL },
> +		/* 253 */ { "Private",					opaque, NULL },
...

Is this really correct? Or should these options only be dissected this
way if the vendor code is M$?

 ciao
   Joerg

-- 
Joerg Mayer                                           <jmayer@xxxxxxxxx>
We are stuck with technology when what we really want is just stuff that
works. Some say that should read Microsoft instead of technology.