Wireshark · Wireshark-users: Re: [Wireshark-users] Win10Pcap and Wireshark portable 2.2.0

[Oscar Moreno <omoreno@xxxxxxxxx>]

Thanks for your email Graham. I would like to be able to run Wireshark from a USB pen drive, so I don't need to ido any installacion. When troubleshooting performance/security issues, sometimes we won't be able to install anything into the computer. However, I just realized that even running Wireshark portable version, you will still need to have either winPcap or win10Pcap installed on the computer. It looks it won be a way to be ruining it from a USB flash drive without installing either WinPcap or Win10Pcap in the computer.

Regards,

On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 2:00 PM, <wireshark-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Send Wireshark-users mailing list submissions to
        wireshark-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxx

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
        https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-users
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
        wireshark-users-request@wireshark.org

You can reach the person managing the list at
        wireshark-users-owner@wireshark.org

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of Wireshark-users digest..."


Today's Topics:

   1. Win10Pcap and Wireshark portable 2.2.0 (Oscar Moreno)
   2. Re: Win10Pcap and Wireshark portable 2.2.0 (Graham Bloice)
   3. Wiresharktraining.com (Ralph Gay)
   4. Re: Wiresharktraining.com (Saulpaugh, Chris)
   5. Re: Wiresharktraining.com (Ralph Gay)
   6. Re: Wiresharktraining.com (Saulpaugh, Chris)


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Message: 1
Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2016 14:28:49 +0200
From: Oscar Moreno <omoreno@xxxxxxxxx>
To: wireshark-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [Wireshark-users] Win10Pcap and Wireshark portable 2.2.0
Message-ID:
        <CAPdJ-AWFsQ8MgmRamAU36B90DvWm03d0YBGz95n6Ww1YBq+5Aw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"

Hello,

I have just installed wireshark portable 2.2.0 in my USB and Win10Pcap into
my windows 10 laptop. I am now having issues with my external mouse and I
don't know if it may be related with the Win10Pcan installation. To be
honest, I was hesitant about installing Win10Pcap, but I am not yet 100%
sure that the current version of winpcap will work fine on Windows 10.
Please advice.

Thanks,
Oscar

On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 2:00 PM, <wireshark-users-request@wireshark.org>
wrote:

> Send Wireshark-users mailing list submissions to
>         wireshark-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
>         https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-users
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
>         wireshark-users-request@wireshark.org
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
>         wireshark-users-owner@wireshark.org
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of Wireshark-users digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
>    1. What does ?Raw packet data? field mean in Wireshark? (??)
>    2. Re: What does ?Raw packet data? field mean in Wireshark?
>       (Jaap Keuter)
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Sun, 18 Sep 2016 11:06:51 +0800
> From: ?? <jie.jiang@xxxxxxxxxx>
> To: wireshark-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [Wireshark-users] What does ?Raw packet data? field mean in
>         Wireshark?
> Message-ID: <8AA0A600-51FB-4256-99BA-4F1F58B9B0CC@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
>
>
>
> As you can see in first figure, what does that Raw packet data mean? What
> is the difference between normal tcp packet in figure 2?
>
> FYI, I'm using Wireshark 2.2.0.
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: <https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-users/
> attachments/20160918/b9498b3f/attachment.html>
> -------------- next part --------------
> A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
> Name: ???? 2016-09-13 ??8.52.23.png
> Type: image/png
> Size: 23833 bytes
> Desc: not available
> URL: <https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-users/
> attachments/20160918/b9498b3f/attachment.png>
> -------------- next part --------------
> A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
> Name: ???? 2016-09-13 ??8.53.04.png
> Type: image/png
> Size: 25088 bytes
> Desc: not available
> URL: <https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-users/
> attachments/20160918/b9498b3f/attachment-0001.png>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 2
> Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2016 14:41:43 -0500
> From: Jaap Keuter <jaap.keuter@xxxxxxxxx>
> To: Community support list for Wireshark
>         <wireshark-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: Re: [Wireshark-users] What does ?Raw packet data? field mean
>         in Wireshark?
> Message-ID: <1EF6294B-4945-4D86-A291-5D17A797F02B@xxxxxxxxx>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
>
> Hi,
>
> The ?Raw packet data' means that there?s no link layer information
> available, just upper (in this can network) layer information.
>
> Thanks,
> Jaap
>
> > On 17 Sep 2016, at 22:06, ?? <jie.jiang@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > <???? 2016-09-13 ??8.52.23.png>
> >
> > <???? 2016-09-13 ??8.53.04.png>
> >
> > As you can see in first figure, what does that Raw packet data mean?
> What is the difference between normal tcp packet in figure 2?
> >
> > FYI, I'm using Wireshark 2.2.0.
> >
> > ____________________________________________________________
> _______________
> > Sent via:    Wireshark-users mailing list <wireshark-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >
> > Archives:    https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-users
> > Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-users
> >             mailto:wireshark-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=
> unsubscribe
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wireshark-users mailing list
> Wireshark-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-users
>
>
> End of Wireshark-users Digest, Vol 124, Issue 7
> ***********************************************
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-users/attachments/20160921/f4aed861/attachment.html>

------------------------------

Message: 2
Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2016 13:35:01 +0100
From: Graham Bloice <graham.bloice@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: Community support list for Wireshark
        <wireshark-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Wireshark-users] Win10Pcap and Wireshark portable 2.2.0
Message-ID:
        <CALcKHKpV0+piJDu7N1+fq4jQTs7NsfrKxq_3VGaFJAC9duDbqQ@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"

On 21 September 2016 at 13:28, Oscar Moreno <omoreno@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Hello,
>
> I have just installed wireshark portable 2.2.0 in my USB and Win10Pcap
> into my windows 10 laptop. I am now having issues with my external mouse
> and I don't know if it may be related with the Win10Pcan installation. To
> be honest, I was hesitant about installing Win10Pcap, but I am not yet 100%
> sure that the current version of winpcap will work fine on Windows 10.
> Please advice.
>
>
>
Win10Pcap is a separate project that is not supported by Wireshark or
WinPcap.  You'll have to contact the Win10Pcap project for support directly.

The current WinPcap 4.1.3 version runs happily on Windows 10.

Why are you using the portable version of Wireshark if you require capture
capabilities, why not just install the regular version which will offer to
install WinPcap for you if required?

--
Graham Bloice
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-users/attachments/20160921/ca21a0ce/attachment.html>

------------------------------

Message: 3
Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2016 10:04:16 -0400
From: Ralph Gay <rjgay33@xxxxxxxxx>
To: Community <wireshark-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [Wireshark-users] Wiresharktraining.com
Message-ID:
        <CACOap5bbsMut6zDMOuHxiZ_U19ePHies5Xxg+qHMcaZYyioJuQ@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"

For several days I have been unable to access the web site. Are others
having the same issue?
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-users/attachments/20160921/a87fb7b0/attachment.html>

------------------------------

Message: 4
Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2016 14:16:41 +0000
From: "Saulpaugh, Chris" <Chris.Saulpaugh@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: Community support list for Wireshark
        <wireshark-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Wireshark-users] Wiresharktraining.com
Message-ID:
        <BD7D4189F0389C4D90D84815A8EF7C503D456536@MXMBCOC01.sdsheriff.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"

Working fine here. Just tried?

Is your DNS having an issue?

From: wireshark-users-bounces@wireshark.org [mailto:wireshark-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Ralph Gay
Sent: Wednesday, September 21, 2016 7:15 AM
To: Community <wireshark-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [Wireshark-users] Wiresharktraining.com

For several days I have been unable to access the web site. Are others having the same issue?
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-users/attachments/20160921/9d45093d/attachment.html>

------------------------------

Message: 5
Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2016 11:14:34 -0400
From: Ralph Gay <rjgay33@xxxxxxxxx>
To: Community support list for Wireshark
        <wireshark-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Wireshark-users] Wiresharktraining.com
Message-ID:
        <CACOap5ZcfdpuuWj3i1Cqgq+G3ep2ngbYsyrmh6sU5wjp+ASWYQ@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"

Thanks for the reply. DNS resolves OK but something in our corporate
network is blocking the site. I just tried cellular and got there fine.

On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 10:16 AM, Saulpaugh, Chris <
Chris.Saulpaugh@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Working fine here. Just tried?
>
>
>
> Is your DNS having an issue?
>
>
>
> *From:* wireshark-users-bounces@wireshark.org [mailto:wireshark-users-
> bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] *On Behalf Of *Ralph Gay
> *Sent:* Wednesday, September 21, 2016 7:15 AM
> *To:* Community <wireshark-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> *Subject:* [Wireshark-users] Wiresharktraining.com
>
>
>
> For several days I have been unable to access the web site. Are others
> having the same issue?
>
> ____________________________________________________________
> _______________
> Sent via:    Wireshark-users mailing list <wireshark-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Archives:    https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-users
> Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-users
>              mailto:wireshark-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=
> unsubscribe
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-users/attachments/20160921/e5a6d519/attachment.html>

------------------------------

Message: 6
Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2016 15:18:00 +0000
From: "Saulpaugh, Chris" <Chris.Saulpaugh@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: Community support list for Wireshark
        <wireshark-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Wireshark-users] Wiresharktraining.com
Message-ID:
        <BD7D4189F0389C4D90D84815A8EF7C503D456C3C@MXMBCOC01.sdsheriff.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"

Gotta love those web proxy/filtering tools!

Your Web Security Team may need to setup a proxy exception to the site once they feel it has been properly vetted for security.

Cheers,

From: wireshark-users-bounces@wireshark.org [mailto:wireshark-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Ralph Gay
Sent: Wednesday, September 21, 2016 8:15 AM
To: Community support list for Wireshark <wireshark-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Wireshark-users] Wiresharktraining.com

Thanks for the reply. DNS resolves OK but something in our corporate network is blocking the site. I just tried cellular and got there fine.

On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 10:16 AM, Saulpaugh, Chris <Chris.Saulpaugh@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:Chris.Saulpaugh@sdsheriff.org>> wrote:
Working fine here. Just tried?

Is your DNS having an issue?

From: wireshark-users-bounces@wireshark.org<mailto:wireshark-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> [mailto:wireshark-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:wireshark-users-bounces@wireshark.org>] On Behalf Of Ralph Gay
Sent: Wednesday, September 21, 2016 7:15 AM
To: Community <wireshark-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:wireshark-users@wireshark.org>>
Subject: [Wireshark-users] Wiresharktraining.com

For several days I have been unable to access the web site. Are others having the same issue?

___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-users mailing list <wireshark-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:wireshark-users@wireshark.org>>
Archives:    https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-users
Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-users
             mailto:wireshark-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:wireshark-users-request@wireshark.org>?subject=unsubscribe

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-users/attachments/20160921/bf04955c/attachment.html>

------------------------------

_______________________________________________
Wireshark-users mailing list
Wireshark-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-users


End of Wireshark-users Digest, Vol 124, Issue 8
***********************************************