Wireshark-users: Re: [Wireshark-users] Wireshark vs. lt-wireshark
Date Index · Thread Index · Other Months · All Mailing Lists
Date Prev · Date Next · Thread Prev · Thread Next
From: Anders Broman <anders.broman@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2013 11:20:53 +0000
 

-----Original Message-----
From: wireshark-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:wireshark-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Ewgenij Sokolovski
Sent: den 11 januari 2013 11:16
To: Community support list for Wireshark
Subject: Re: [Wireshark-users] Wireshark vs. lt-wireshark

>> "wireshark" the wrapper script or "wireshark" the program that gets 
>> installed when you do "make install"?
>
>The program that gets installed when I do "make install".
>
>The problem is that my dissector is not a plugin but a built-in one. The source code is in asn1/ directory. 
>Thus, it should be loaded not dependant on whether Wireshark is run from build directory or not. Or do I 
>misunderstand anything?

When creating the source code by running (n)make (using asn2wrs) the source code should be copied to the ../dissectors/Directory(automatically) and the file packet-foo.[ch] should be part of Makefile.common in that dir and CMakeLists.txt in ../epan or added to Custom.common.

Regards
Anders

___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-users mailing list <wireshark-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-users
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-users
             mailto:wireshark-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe