Wireshark-users: Re: [Wireshark-users] 8-10% packet error/loss is normal wired network?
What does the switch show the printer port being linked up as?
Frank
-----Original Message-----
From: wireshark-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:wireshark-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Flako
Sent: Wednesday, July 11, 2012 2:57 PM
To: Community support list for Wireshark
Subject: Re: [Wireshark-users] 8-10% packet error/loss is normal wired
network?
2012/7/10 Jim Aragon <Jim@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
> At 08:32 AM 7/10/2012, you wrote:
>
> Counting only "tcp.analysis.retransmission" I'm from 0.95% to 1.21%, a
value
> more enjoyable. :)
>
> I think it's despicable for further research .. but I get the question if
> this value is normal :)
> In a wireless link, a loss of 1% is acceptable, but in a network cableda?
>
>
> I would expect lost packets within local traffic in a wired LAN to be
close
> to zero; certainly under 0.5%. However, depending on the traffic levels on
> your network, if the 0.95% to 1.21% retransmissions are not causing a
> problem, it might not be worth your time to track down.
>
> If you do want to try to track it down, packets generally get lost at a
> network device, so go to your switches one at a time and capture
> simultaneously on both sides of the switch. If you see "previous segment
> lost" on one side of the switch, but not on the other, then that switch is
> dropping packets. The same for any other network devices that the traffic
> passes through, such as routers or firewalls.
>
> If you can't capture on both sides of the switch simultaneously, then
> there's another method to identify the point of packet loss. Find a TCP
> retransmission, then apply a display filter for the tcp stream index
number
> and the TCP sequence number. If you see both the original packet and the
> retransmission, then the packet loss was downstream from you. If you see
> only the retransmission, but not the original packet, then the packet loss
> was upstream from you. Be sure to do this for several retransmissions. As
> you identify whether packet loss was upstream or downstream from you, you
> can keep moving your capture point until you find the device that is
> dropping packets.
>
> You also said that you have a 100mps switch and a 1Gbps switch. Are these
> switches directly connected to each other? If so, I'd start with the 1
gbps
> switch. If the 1 gbps switch is receiving traffic from the attached
devices
> faster than 100 mbps, then it will be forced to drop packets because it
> can't transmit the packets to the other switch any faster than 100 mbps.
In
> other words, it will be receiving packets faster than it can send them,
and
> at some point, the switch's buffers will fill up and it will have to drop
> packets.
>
> Jim
>
Hello Prigge, Jim
The printer is at 100Mb / s FULL with autonegotiation disabled, the
desktop was as 1Gb / s FULL with autonegotiation enabled.
The swicth A (100Mb / s) and B (1Gb / s) are connected directly to each
other.
Now connect the Desktop Printer and a switch C (only two), then swich
C connects directly to swicth A.
I'm sniffer on the Desktop to see differences and discard things. I
tell them when finished.
Thank you for writing so far.
(Examples of how to find a fault will serve me now or the next)
___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via: Wireshark-users mailing list <wireshark-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-users
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-users
mailto:wireshark-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe
