Wireshark · Wireshark-users: Re: [Wireshark-users] 答复: Is that a bug in packet-gsm_sms.c ?

Wireshark-users: Re: [Wireshark-users] 答复: Is that a bug in packet-gsm_sms.c ?

From: Guy Harris <guy@xxxxxxxxxxxx>

Date: Sun, 3 Apr 2011 10:26:40 -0700

On Apr 3, 2011, at 10:22 AM, damker wrote:

> Oh , in 3GPP TS 23.040 the PI is a Mandatory parameter .

Yes.  It's mandatory for both SMS-DELIVER-REPORTs from RP-ERROR and SMS-DELIVER-REPORTs from RP-ACK, unlike the FCS, which is a Mandatory parameter only for SMS-DELIVER-REPORTs from RP-ERROR.

Follow-Ups:
- [Wireshark-users] 答复: 答复: Is that a bug in packet-gsm_sms.c ?
  - From: damker

References:
- [Wireshark-users] Wireshark : checking a new protocol
  - From: ankit sambyal
- [Wireshark-users] Is that a bug in packet-gsm_sms.c ?
  - From: damker
- Re: [Wireshark-users] Is that a bug in packet-gsm_sms.c ?
  - From: Guy Harris
- [Wireshark-users] 答复: Is that a bug in packet-gsm_sms.c ?
  - From: damker

Prev by Date: [Wireshark-users] 答复: Is that a bug in packet-gsm_sms.c ?
Next by Date: [Wireshark-users] 答复: 答复: Is that a bug in packet-gsm_sms.c ?
Previous by thread: [Wireshark-users] 答复: Is that a bug in packet-gsm_sms.c ?
Next by thread: [Wireshark-users] 答复: 答复: Is that a bug in packet-gsm_sms.c ?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread