Wireshark-users: Re: [Wireshark-users] mean opinion score (Wireshark-users Digest, Vol 47, Issue
From: "COHEN, HARVEY S (ATTLABS)" <hc2182@xxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 12 Apr 2010 15:45:57 -0400
ITU-T Recommendation G.107 (http://www.itu.int/itudoc/itu-t/aap/sg12aap/history/g107/index.html) gives the algorithm for the so-called E-model as the common ITU-T Transmission Rating Model. This computational model can be useful to transmission planners, to help ensure that users will be satisfied with end-to-end transmission performance. The primary output of the model is a scalar rating of transmission quality. This rating can be mapped to a predicted mean opinion score. A major feature of this model is the use of transmission impairment factors that reflect the effects of modern signal processing devices. In the year 2000 revision, an enhanced version of the E-model was provided, in order to better take into account the effects of room noise at the send side, and quantizing distortion. With the year 2002 revision, the impairment due to random packet-loss has been included in a parametric way for different codecs. Various parties in the telecomm industry use the E-model to compute predicted mean opinion score based on packet loss and end-to-end delay for a given audio codec. Several vendors sell systems that monitor packet performance and report "mean opinion score". At best, this "mean opinion score" is a single number that summarizes packet performance with respect to both packet loss and delay, so some service providers write Service Level Agreements in terms of this "mean opinion score" instead of specifying the raw loss and delay measurements. It is important to remember that the E-model has literally dozens of other parameters. In order to use the model as described above, the provider must assume that all the other parameters are fixed at some nominal values; nobody actually measures them. It is also important to remember that Recommendation G.107 begins with a very explicit disclaimer: "Such estimates are only made for transmission planning purposes and not for actual customer opinion prediction (for which there is no agreed-upon model recommended by the ITU-T)." Harvey S. Cohen Message: 16 Date: Mon, 12 Apr 2010 11:16:58 -0400 From: ankur aggarwal <ankur.mast.frn@xxxxxxxxx> Subject: [Wireshark-users] mean opinion score To: Community support list for Wireshark <wireshark-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Message-ID: <y2o8176612d1004120816n1a6c2923u87ebc21cca3aad95@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Can anybody help me in finding MOS through wireshark or any other s/w which work on my intranet. (offline mode). -- With Regards Ankur Aggarwal Research intern Optical Zeitgeist Laboratory Institut National de la Recherche Scientifique (INRS) - ?MT 800, de la Gaucheti?re Ouest, bureau 6900 Montr?al, QC, H5A 1K6 CANADA Ph: +1 514 966-2661 E-mail: ankur.1066@xxxxxxxxx Web: www.zeitgeistlab.ca Group Member Page: http://zeitgeistlab.ca/doc/groupmembers.html -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-users/attachments/20100412/67ca 3c2d/attachment.htm
- Prev by Date: Re: [Wireshark-users] Looking for a portable sniffing-friendlyhub/switch
- Next by Date: Re: [Wireshark-users] Looking for a portable sniffing-friendlyhub/switch
- Previous by thread: Re: [Wireshark-users] traffic sniffer
- Next by thread: Re: [Wireshark-users] Dup ACK #1
- Index(es):