Wireshark-users: Re: [Wireshark-users] Network Name resolution
From: ketzal devims <ketzaldevims@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 2 Feb 2010 18:00:03 +0100
I'll try it, thanks a lot

2010/2/2 Anders Broman <anders.broman@xxxxxxxxxxxx>

Hi,
I think the just released 1.2.6 resolved bugs in this area.
Regards
Anders

-----Original Message-----
From: wireshark-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxx on behalf of ketzal devims
Sent: Tue 2/2/2010 5:22 PM
To: Community support list for Wireshark
Subject: [Wireshark-users] Network Name resolution

Hi all,

I'm using Microsoft Windows XP and Wireshark 1.2.5 which is the latest
stable version.

I have a problem with name resolution for network layer.

I put a hosts file in both place (%USERPROFILE%\Application Data\Wireshark\
and c:\WINDOWS\system32\drivers\etc\)
I activated Network Layer Name Resolution, with concurrent DNS (500) as
default parameter, and then, name resolution works (almost) perfectly.
That mean that wireshark search correctly the ip/name association:
- first in the hosts files
- and then I guess to DNS servers.

The issue is the following:
When I disconnect my network cable, that mean that I'm not able to reach a
DNS server, and I open a wireshark trace, wireshark is freezing, and I need
to stop the processus by hand.
Looks like threading for DNS request is associated with trace display... and
if one fails, the other too.

Is it a bug or a misconfiguration from my part? Does someone know how to
solve that problem?

Thanks a lot in advance.

Best Regards
ketzaldev


___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-users mailing list <wireshark-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-users
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-users
            mailto:wireshark-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe