Wireshark-users: Re: [Wireshark-users] Mysterious packet loss during capture
From: Abhijit Bare <abhibare@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 8 Oct 2009 14:05:07 -0600
If you have dns lookups on (converting IP addresses to hostnames) during packet captures, packet losses might occur. Try without dns lookups - tcpdump "-n" on Linux

- Abhijit

On Thu, Oct 8, 2009 at 1:58 PM, <gkrames@xxxxxxx> wrote:
Hi all,

I am fighting for a while now with occasional packet loss during
capture in promiscous mode.
Environment: Linux 2.6.27, 32 bit, NIC e1000e, 100MBit network with
4MBit/s actual traffic (4%), wireshark 1.2.2;
the capturing PC has <5% CPU load and >1 GB free phys. memory).

My test case captures 100K packets (using the -c) option.
A random number of packets is dropped (about 20..2000) with ever run.

tcpdump, dumpcap, tshark, and wireshark show this behaviour.
Interestingly, tcpdump says "nn packets dropped by kernel".
So this is most likely a kernel/network stack problem.

Trials playing with some kernel sysctl parameters
(increasing various buffer sizes, decreasing sheduler granularity
and others) has not improved anything so far.

ethtool -G eth0 rx-usecs 250 (or 125), limitting interrupts
to 4000 or 8000 /sec, has reduced the packet loss but still it is
there.

Any ideas what else I could try?
Also any hint would be appreciated how to find out why the kernel
decides to drop some packets.

Thanks,
Gerfl






--
Jetzt kostenlos herunterladen: Internet Explorer 8 und Mozilla Firefox 3.5 -
sicherer, schneller und einfacher! http://portal.gmx.net/de/go/chbrowser
___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-users mailing list <wireshark-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-users
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-users
            mailto:wireshark-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe