Wireshark · Wireshark-users: Re: [Wireshark-users] Wireshark v1.2.0's msvcp90.dll real or FP?

Wireshark-users: Re: [Wireshark-users] Wireshark v1.2.0's msvcp90.dll real or FP?

From: Gerald Combs <gerald@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2009 10:56:12 -0700

Phillip Pi wrote:
> Strange. My DiamondCS MD5 v1.4.0.0 tool doesn't match yours from
> portable Wireshark (after extraction): 7B80921F9F6126F53F4250E2B23E0EA3

I copied msvcp90.dll to a temp directory and ran "upx -q" on it using
UPX 3.01w on it. The UPX-ed hashes are:

MD5(msvcp90.dll)= 7b80921f9f6126f53f4250e2b23e0ea3
SHA1(msvcp90.dll)= 27617e999dab00644c776d925b666d2a3d60faa6
RIPEMD160(msvcp90.dll)= 1b54e0a1c2f2d11b5aaac85c501f8c53fa71856e

I generated the hashes using "openssl md5", "openssl sha1", and "openssl
rmd160" respectively.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [Wireshark-users] Wireshark v1.2.0's msvcp90.dll real or FP?
  - From: Phillip Pi

References:
- [Wireshark-users] Wireshark v1.2.0's msvcp90.dll real or FP?
  - From: Phillip Pi
- Re: [Wireshark-users] Wireshark v1.2.0's msvcp90.dll real or FP?
  - From: Gerald Combs
- Re: [Wireshark-users] Wireshark v1.2.0's msvcp90.dll real or FP?
  - From: Phillip Pi

Prev by Date: Re: [Wireshark-users] Wireshark v1.2.0's msvcp90.dll real or FP?
Next by Date: Re: [Wireshark-users] Wireshark v1.2.0's msvcp90.dll real or FP?
Previous by thread: Re: [Wireshark-users] Wireshark v1.2.0's msvcp90.dll real or FP?
Next by thread: Re: [Wireshark-users] Wireshark v1.2.0's msvcp90.dll real or FP?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread