Wireshark-users: Re: [Wireshark-users] Huge VoIP Problem :(
From: Jeffrey Walton <noloader@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2009 15:53:30 -0400
Hi Mark, I jumping in with Ryan because I agree with his experience. Here's some of mine (for what it is worth)... >> The phone system is manufactured by Allworx No experience. Perhaps someone else can comment on Allworx >> The switches we are using are Dell 3548P PowerConnects. >> I've configure the network to use two VLANs - one for phone, >> one for everything else - and used VLAN tagging and CoS to >> prioritize VoIP traffic. I've actually combed through the configs >> with a Dell engineer, and we're good there. I've had a number of hard to track down issues related to Dell hardware and the Broadcom ethernet gear. During the two nastier issues, the port would process data fine for a while. Then throughput would drop to its knees. It was as if packets were being dropped following a reciprocal-exponential curve. The Dell hardware never reported any problems. Also, is the problem with all phones with a more or less random distribution? Does it look random but with a single switch in common? or is it related to a collection of handsets? Jeff On 6/19/09, Ryan Zuidema <ryan.zuidema@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Running computers through the phones is entirely normal, the point of VoIP > is to have a 1 wire office. That said most VoIP installs I have seen still > run separate lines. The reasoning is that it’s easier to maintain and the > cost difference is small to run two wires as opposed to one. > > It’s not surprising that the server doesn’t tag. It’s reasonable to assume > that ALL traffic to that port would be on the phone VLAN and high priority. > The only reason your endpoints need to tag is if they have multiple QoS > requirements. > > Ryan > > From: wireshark-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > [mailto:wireshark-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of > Mark Jeffers > Sent: Friday, June 19, 2009 6:40 AM > To: Community support list for Wireshark > Subject: Re: [Wireshark-users] Huge VoIP Problem :( > > The phones actually act as a level 2 switch themselves. They tag their own > packets for VLAN9 (the voice VLAN on my network) and tag the packets of the > PC attached to them (if there is one) as VLAN1. > > Attaching a phone and a pc to the same switch port has made me nervous from > day one, but the vendor swore up and down it would work no problem. > > Also, one thing that has me shaking my head in disbelief is that while > Allworx built their phones with VLAN tagging abilities, their main phone > server can't tag its own packets. > > But anyway, I was of course suspicious of the pc/phone combo, but some of my > most problematic phones have no pc attached to them. Plus, I figured > building the VLANs would solve any problem related to that. Perhaps I was > wrong? > > Cheers, > > mj > > [SNIP] > > From: wireshark-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > [mailto:wireshark-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of > Mark Jeffers > Sent: Wednesday, June 17, 2009 9:32 AM > To: wireshark-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: [Wireshark-users] Huge VoIP Problem :( > > We've been having a terrible time with a new VoIP system on our network. > > The phone system is manufactured by Allworx - it is tied to the outside > world with a standard PRI, so the only IP portion of calls takes place > between our LAN phone server and the IP extensions. > > Several of the extensions are having packet loss problems resulting in > echoes, "static", dropped audio, etc. The problems are intermittent and > jump around to different phones on the network. > > The switches we are using are Dell 3548P PowerConnects. I've configure the > network to use two VLANs - one for phone, one for everything else - and used > VLAN tagging and CoS to prioritize VoIP traffic. I've actually combed > through the configs with a Dell engineer, and we're good there. > > So I'm relatively new to both VoIP and hardcore packet analysis, but I found > an excellent article on troubleshooting VoIP using wireshark and followed > instructions. > > I mirrored one of the Trunk ports on the switch to my laptop, configured > Wireshark to filter out all but UDP packets and let it run for about an > hour. > > The results are horrible... I've attached screenshot images so you guys > might be able to help me figure this out. > > When I ran an RTP Stream analysis, there were blocks of sessions where > several of them had "Max Delta" in the thousands (some in the 9000s), > resulting in 90+% packet loss! See Image1,jpg > > I drilled down into one of the streams to see a bunch of "Wrong Sequence nr" > messages - See Image2.jpg > > I went to VoIP Calls under the statistics menu, and pulled up the same call > shown in Image2 - looked fine to me, but I'm a noob - See Image3.jpg > > I'm at a loss here. Obviously severe network issues, or the Phone Switch > is bad. I've tried everything I can think of to no avail. Anybody have > any ideas of what might be wrong, or what further information I should > gather to help pinpoint the issue? I'm going nuts here and any help would > be greatly, greatly appreciated. :) > > Cheers, > > Mark > [SNIP]
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [Wireshark-users] Huge VoIP Problem :(
- From: Gerald Combs
- Re: [Wireshark-users] Huge VoIP Problem :(
- References:
- [Wireshark-users] Huge VoIP Problem :(
- From: Mark Jeffers
- Re: [Wireshark-users] Huge VoIP Problem :(
- From: Bob Carlson
- Re: [Wireshark-users] Huge VoIP Problem :(
- From: Mark Jeffers
- Re: [Wireshark-users] Huge VoIP Problem :(
- From: Bob Carlson
- Re: [Wireshark-users] Huge VoIP Problem :(
- From: Mark Jeffers
- [Wireshark-users] Huge VoIP Problem :(
- Prev by Date: Re: [Wireshark-users] Does wireshark works under VMWare?
- Next by Date: Re: [Wireshark-users] Huge VoIP Problem :(
- Previous by thread: Re: [Wireshark-users] Huge VoIP Problem :(
- Next by thread: Re: [Wireshark-users] Huge VoIP Problem :(
- Index(es):