Wireshark-users: Re: [Wireshark-users] [Bug 3360] Wireshark givesdecodingerrorduring rnsap messa
From: Tapas Chatterjee <tapas.chatterjee@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 3 Apr 2009 17:29:19 +0530
Hi, If encoding is wrong then our internal tool can't decodes it properly also you have decoded the same message in some way which is also similar with our decoding. So I think there is no problem in encoding procedure. Also when I have tried to move one byte offset by forcefully before start decoding "neighbouring-FDD-CellInfo" its doing fine but in the case of array of extension field it gives some wrong result I know it is not feasible way may be here need some modification in packet-per.c file and asn2wrs.py files. I have also tried the SVN 27853 correction patch but it is not working Gives some error like "UNKNOWN PER: 10.9.3.8.1" Another one you have mentioned c-ID: 331 00f0 01 4b But I haven't got that point where you are getting such value in the capture? Are you assuming this value according to the IEs definition? Please help to resolve this issue. With regards, Tapas -----Original Message----- From: wireshark-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:wireshark-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Anders Broman Sent: Thursday, April 02, 2009 8:52 PM To: Community support list for Wireshark Subject: Re: [Wireshark-users] [Bug 3360] Wireshark givesdecodingerrorduring rnsap messagedissection Hi, I think your encoding may be wrong: normally (INTEGER) = 9812 //raj 38 >From 3GPP TS 25.423: RNSAP shall use the ASN.1 Basic Packed Encoding Rules (BASIC-PER) Aligned Variant : c-ID: 331 00f0 01 4b Next bit is the extension bit ( bit 8 of 00f2) 0... .... Extension Present Bit: False Next "uARFCNforNu: 9812(actually 38)" should be encoded and I think that should be placed byte aligned 16bits(/* 10.5.7.3 */ ) Not 8. Regards Anders -----Original Message----- From: wireshark-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:wireshark-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Anders Broman Sent: den 26 mars 2009 10:07 To: Community support list for Wireshark Subject: Re: [Wireshark-users] [Bug 3360] Wireshark gives decodingerrorduring rnsap messagedissection Hi, Does this decoding look right to you? Fore some reeason dissecting the actual trace with my fix does not work(reassembly???) but I extracted the rnsap data And used text2pcap to crate a new packet. ( Edit->preferenses_>protocols->DLT_USER 150 -> rnsap). Regards Anders -----Original Message----- From: wireshark-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:wireshark-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Tapas Chatterjee Sent: den 26 mars 2009 05:41 To: Community support list for Wireshark Subject: Re: [Wireshark-users] [Bug 3360] Wireshark gives decoding errorduring rnsap messagedissection Hi, I am decoding the message some of our internal tools (based on ASN) which gives the correct decoding result. So I think there is no error in the message. Regards Tapas -----Original Message----- From: wireshark-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:wireshark-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Anders Broman Sent: Wednesday, March 25, 2009 10:38 PM To: Community support list for Wireshark Subject: Re: [Wireshark-users] [Bug 3360] Wireshark gives decoding errorduring rnsap messagedissection Hi, Do you have a "Correct" decoding by some other tool? I think the problem may be due to: Neighbouring-FDD-CellInformation ::= SEQUENCE ( SIZE (1..maxNrOfFDDNeighboursPerRNC,...)) OF Neighbouring-FDD-CellInformationItem E.g the SEQUENCE OF constraint has extension which is not catered for in Wireshark but when I try to fix it I get strange results :-( Regards Anders -----Original Message----- From: wireshark-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:wireshark-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Tapas Chatterjee Sent: den 25 mars 2009 13:11 To: wireshark-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: [Wireshark-users] [Bug 3360] Wireshark gives decoding error during rnsap messagedissection Hi, It is going right up to rNC ID: 109 after its start dissection "neighbouring-FDD-CellInformation" Where C-ID the value decode now "8448" Hex "20 01" instead "331" Hex "01 4b" So offset movement start's going wrong here. Hope this info may help you. Any clarity further let me know. With regards Tapas -----Original Message----- From: bugzilla-daemon@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:bugzilla-daemon@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] Sent: Wednesday, March 25, 2009 5:13 PM To: Tapas Chatterjee Subject: [Bug 3360] Wireshark gives decoding error during rnsap messagedissection https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3360 Anders Broman <anders.broman@xxxxxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ------------------------------------------------------------------------ ---- CC| |anders.broman@xxxxxxxxxxxx --- Comment #1 from Anders Broman <anders.broman@xxxxxxxxxxxx> 2009-03-25 04:43:07 PDT --- Hi, Looking at packet 9 txDiversityIndicator: true (0) 0e0 2a 0a 00 -- The next is the iE-Extensions ProtocolExtensionContainer { { Neighbouring-FDD-CellInformationItem-ExtIEs} } OPTIONAL, .Sequence-Of Length: 46338 00e0 2a 0a 00 b5 01 ----- So here's where it start's to go wrong is the decoding up to here looking ok? or is WS missing some mandatorry element? Should it have been on octet further eg '01' insted can you pinpoint more exactly waht's wrong up to here? Regards Anders -- Configure bugmail: https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You reported the bug. "DISCLAIMER: This message is proprietary to Aricent and is intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. It may contain privileged or confidential information and should not be circulated or used for any purpose other than for what it is intended. If you have received this message in error,please notify the originator immediately. If you are not the intended recipient, you are notified that you are strictly prohibited from using, copying, altering, or disclosing the contents of this message. Aricent accepts no responsibility for loss or damage arising from the use of the information transmitted by this email including damage from virus." ________________________________________________________________________ ___ Sent via: Wireshark-users mailing list <wireshark-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-users Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-users mailto:wireshark-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe ________________________________________________________________________ ___ Sent via: Wireshark-users mailing list <wireshark-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-users Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-users mailto:wireshark-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe "DISCLAIMER: This message is proprietary to Aricent and is intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. It may contain privileged or confidential information and should not be circulated or used for any purpose other than for what it is intended. If you have received this message in error,please notify the originator immediately. If you are not the intended recipient, you are notified that you are strictly prohibited from using, copying, altering, or disclosing the contents of this message. Aricent accepts no responsibility for loss or damage arising from the use of the information transmitted by this email including damage from virus." ________________________________________________________________________ ___ Sent via: Wireshark-users mailing list <wireshark-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-users Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-users mailto:wireshark-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-users mailing list <wireshark-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-users Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-users mailto:wireshark-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe "DISCLAIMER: This message is proprietary to Aricent and is intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. It may contain privileged or confidential information and should not be circulated or used for any purpose other than for what it is intended. If you have received this message in error,please notify the originator immediately. If you are not the intended recipient, you are notified that you are strictly prohibited from using, copying, altering, or disclosing the contents of this message. Aricent accepts no responsibility for loss or damage arising from the use of the information transmitted by this email including damage from virus."
- Follow-Ups:
- References:
- Prev by Date: [Wireshark-users] Displaying icmp type and code in tshark
- Next by Date: Re: [Wireshark-users] Tshark statistics problem
- Previous by thread: Re: [Wireshark-users] [Bug 3360] Wireshark gives decodingerrorduring rnsap messagedissection
- Next by thread: Re: [Wireshark-users] [Bug 3360] Wiresharkgivesdecodingerrorduring rnsap messagedissection
- Index(es):