Wireshark-users: Re: [Wireshark-users] [Bug 3360] Wireshark gives decodingerrorduring rnsap messa
From: "Anders Broman" <anders.broman@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2009 17:03:33 +0100
Hi, Wireshark didn't take >Neighbouring-FDD-CellInformation ::= SEQUENCE ( SIZE >(1..maxNrOfFDDNeighboursPerRNC,...)) OF >Neighbouring-FDD-CellInformationItem >E.g the SEQUENCE OF constraint has extension which is not catered for in Wireshark Into account which lead to it beeing one bit off in the decoding. The next problem is with reasembly I beleve, in the trace the same message are sent 2 or 3 times Which I think messes up reassembly... Regards Anders -----Original Message----- From: wireshark-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:wireshark-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Tapas Chatterjee Sent: den 26 mars 2009 10:30 To: Community support list for Wireshark Subject: Re: [Wireshark-users] [Bug 3360] Wireshark gives decodingerrorduring rnsap messagedissection Hi, Yea the rnsap_packet.txt file dissection result and my internal tools dissection result are same. Could you please tell me what way you fix it? Also the packet number 10 gives dissection error. With regards, Tapas -----Original Message----- From: wireshark-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:wireshark-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Anders Broman Sent: Thursday, March 26, 2009 2:37 PM To: Community support list for Wireshark Subject: Re: [Wireshark-users] [Bug 3360] Wireshark gives decodingerrorduring rnsap messagedissection Hi, Does this decoding look right to you? Fore some reeason dissecting the actual trace with my fix does not work(reassembly???) but I extracted the rnsap data And used text2pcap to crate a new packet. ( Edit->preferenses_>protocols->DLT_USER 150 -> rnsap). Regards Anders -----Original Message----- From: wireshark-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:wireshark-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Tapas Chatterjee Sent: den 26 mars 2009 05:41 To: Community support list for Wireshark Subject: Re: [Wireshark-users] [Bug 3360] Wireshark gives decoding errorduring rnsap messagedissection Hi, I am decoding the message some of our internal tools (based on ASN) which gives the correct decoding result. So I think there is no error in the message. Regards Tapas -----Original Message----- From: wireshark-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:wireshark-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Anders Broman Sent: Wednesday, March 25, 2009 10:38 PM To: Community support list for Wireshark Subject: Re: [Wireshark-users] [Bug 3360] Wireshark gives decoding errorduring rnsap messagedissection Hi, Do you have a "Correct" decoding by some other tool? I think the problem may be due to: Neighbouring-FDD-CellInformation ::= SEQUENCE ( SIZE (1..maxNrOfFDDNeighboursPerRNC,...)) OF Neighbouring-FDD-CellInformationItem E.g the SEQUENCE OF constraint has extension which is not catered for in Wireshark but when I try to fix it I get strange results :-( Regards Anders -----Original Message----- From: wireshark-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:wireshark-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Tapas Chatterjee Sent: den 25 mars 2009 13:11 To: wireshark-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: [Wireshark-users] [Bug 3360] Wireshark gives decoding error during rnsap messagedissection Hi, It is going right up to rNC ID: 109 after its start dissection "neighbouring-FDD-CellInformation" Where C-ID the value decode now "8448" Hex "20 01" instead "331" Hex "01 4b" So offset movement start's going wrong here. Hope this info may help you. Any clarity further let me know. With regards Tapas -----Original Message----- From: bugzilla-daemon@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:bugzilla-daemon@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] Sent: Wednesday, March 25, 2009 5:13 PM To: Tapas Chatterjee Subject: [Bug 3360] Wireshark gives decoding error during rnsap messagedissection https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3360 Anders Broman <anders.broman@xxxxxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ------------------------------------------------------------------------ ---- CC| |anders.broman@xxxxxxxxxxxx --- Comment #1 from Anders Broman <anders.broman@xxxxxxxxxxxx> 2009-03-25 04:43:07 PDT --- Hi, Looking at packet 9 txDiversityIndicator: true (0) 0e0 2a 0a 00 -- The next is the iE-Extensions ProtocolExtensionContainer { { Neighbouring-FDD-CellInformationItem-ExtIEs} } OPTIONAL, .Sequence-Of Length: 46338 00e0 2a 0a 00 b5 01 ----- So here's where it start's to go wrong is the decoding up to here looking ok? or is WS missing some mandatorry element? Should it have been on octet further eg '01' insted can you pinpoint more exactly waht's wrong up to here? Regards Anders -- Configure bugmail: https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You reported the bug. "DISCLAIMER: This message is proprietary to Aricent and is intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. It may contain privileged or confidential information and should not be circulated or used for any purpose other than for what it is intended. If you have received this message in error,please notify the originator immediately. If you are not the intended recipient, you are notified that you are strictly prohibited from using, copying, altering, or disclosing the contents of this message. Aricent accepts no responsibility for loss or damage arising from the use of the information transmitted by this email including damage from virus." ________________________________________________________________________ ___ Sent via: Wireshark-users mailing list <wireshark-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-users Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-users mailto:wireshark-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe ________________________________________________________________________ ___ Sent via: Wireshark-users mailing list <wireshark-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-users Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-users mailto:wireshark-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe "DISCLAIMER: This message is proprietary to Aricent and is intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. It may contain privileged or confidential information and should not be circulated or used for any purpose other than for what it is intended. If you have received this message in error,please notify the originator immediately. If you are not the intended recipient, you are notified that you are strictly prohibited from using, copying, altering, or disclosing the contents of this message. Aricent accepts no responsibility for loss or damage arising from the use of the information transmitted by this email including damage from virus." ________________________________________________________________________ ___ Sent via: Wireshark-users mailing list <wireshark-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-users Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-users mailto:wireshark-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe "DISCLAIMER: This message is proprietary to Aricent and is intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. It may contain privileged or confidential information and should not be circulated or used for any purpose other than for what it is intended. If you have received this message in error,please notify the originator immediately. If you are not the intended recipient, you are notified that you are strictly prohibited from using, copying, altering, or disclosing the contents of this message. Aricent accepts no responsibility for loss or damage arising from the use of the information transmitted by this email including damage from virus." ________________________________________________________________________ ___ Sent via: Wireshark-users mailing list <wireshark-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-users Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-users mailto:wireshark-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe
- Follow-Ups:
- References:
- [Wireshark-users] [Bug 3360] Wireshark gives decoding error during rnsap messagedissection
- From: Tapas Chatterjee
- Re: [Wireshark-users] [Bug 3360] Wireshark gives decoding error during rnsap messagedissection
- From: Anders Broman
- Re: [Wireshark-users] [Bug 3360] Wireshark gives decoding errorduring rnsap messagedissection
- From: Tapas Chatterjee
- Re: [Wireshark-users] [Bug 3360] Wireshark gives decoding errorduring rnsap messagedissection
- From: Anders Broman
- Re: [Wireshark-users] [Bug 3360] Wireshark gives decodingerrorduring rnsap messagedissection
- From: Tapas Chatterjee
- [Wireshark-users] [Bug 3360] Wireshark gives decoding error during rnsap messagedissection
- Prev by Date: Re: [Wireshark-users] Don't see DHCP on the Expressions list
- Next by Date: [Wireshark-users] Wireshark Crashes
- Previous by thread: Re: [Wireshark-users] [Bug 3360] Wireshark gives decodingerrorduring rnsap messagedissection
- Next by thread: Re: [Wireshark-users] [Bug 3360] Wireshark gives decoding error during rnsap messagedissection
- Index(es):