Wireshark-users: [Wireshark-users] text2pcap_windowsXP
From: "Faten SOLTANI" <faten.soltani@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2009 16:54:30 +0100 (CET)
Hi I'm using C++2005, and Windows XP. if it's possible to explan to me step by step how to use and excute text2pcap progrem. Regards Send Wireshark-users mailing list submissions to > wireshark-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > https://wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-users > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to > wireshark-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > > You can reach the person managing the list at > wireshark-users-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific > than "Re: Contents of Wireshark-users digest..." > > > Today's Topics: > > 1. Re: TCP: window scaling (Sake Blok) > 2. Re: TCP: window scaling (Jo Verstraelen) > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Message: 1 > Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2009 13:17:51 +0100 > From: "Sake Blok" <sake@xxxxxxxxxx> > Subject: Re: [Wireshark-users] TCP: window scaling > To: "Community support list for Wireshark" > <wireshark-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Message-ID: <9685A7DC86AC47DD9CFD050F1CA5B048@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" > > Jo, > > Both ends of the tcp connection need to support Window scaling for it to > be used: > > "This option is an offer, not a promise; both sides must send Window Scale > options in their SYN segments to enable window scaling in either > direction." > (From http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc1323) > > In your trace, host 63.245.209.93 does not support Window scaling, as the > SYN/ACK that it sends does not have the window scaling option. Therfore no > window scaling will be used and Wireshark displays non-scaled values. > > Hope this helps, > Cheers, > Sake > ----- Original Message ----- > From: Jo Verstraelen > To: Community support list for Wireshark > Sent: Monday, March 23, 2009 11:58 AM > Subject: Re: [Wireshark-users] TCP: window scaling > > > Hi Sake, > > > > Here you go: http://denuitlaat.be/tcp/windowscaled1.pcap . > It shows that a session is started with a SYN and the option ws is > present (ws = 2). The segments following do not show a scaled window > size. > > > > Regards, > > jo > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > From: wireshark-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > [mailto:wireshark-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Sake Blok > Sent: maandag 23 maart 2009 11:40 > To: Community support list for Wireshark > Subject: Re: [Wireshark-users] TCP: window scaling > > > > Hi Jo, > > > > The window size should consistently be displayed within one TCP session. > Between sessions, there could be difference, because either there is no > scaling, or the SYN, SYN/ACK were not present in the tracefile. If that > does not explain the differences you see, could you provide a small > capture showing this issue? > > > > Cheers, > > Sake > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: Jo Verstraelen > > To: wireshark-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > > Sent: Monday, March 23, 2009 11:03 AM > > Subject: [Wireshark-users] TCP: window scaling > > > > Hi, > > > > Is there a reason why sometimes in a connection which received a > window scaler (syn;syn,ack) , the window size is > > shown as "number (scaled)" and sometimes just as "number" (non scaled) > in the next segments. Cause in the last case its not > > possible to know the exact window size as the window scale factor is > non present in the segments after the syn; syn,ack. > > Kind regards, > > Jo > > > > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > ___________________________________________________________________________ > Sent via: Wireshark-users mailing list > <wireshark-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-users > Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-users > mailto:wireshark-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > ___________________________________________________________________________ > Sent via: Wireshark-users mailing list > <wireshark-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-users > Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-users > mailto:wireshark-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe > -------------- next part -------------- > An HTML attachment was scrubbed... > URL: > http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-users/attachments/20090323/4d7e7f30/attachment.htm > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 2 > Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2009 13:59:36 +0100 > From: "Jo Verstraelen" <J.Verstraelen@xxxxxxxxxx> > Subject: Re: [Wireshark-users] TCP: window scaling > To: "Community support list for Wireshark" > <wireshark-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Message-ID: > <EAE313D9DF8760419A852DE40E654592049E14AC@SRV-SATURNUS.OPTION.local> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" > > Sake, > > > > That explains... > But that doesn't change the fact that it is bizar, because the > destination ip of the server in the pcap file is a webserver of the > Mozilla corp. So a 100MBit+ webserver that does not support window > scaling? > > > > Thanks for the info, > > jo > > > > ________________________________ > > From: wireshark-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > [mailto:wireshark-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Sake Blok > Sent: maandag 23 maart 2009 13:18 > To: Community support list for Wireshark > Subject: Re: [Wireshark-users] TCP: window scaling > > > > Jo, > > > > Both ends of the tcp connection need to support Window scaling for it to > be used: > > > > "This option is an offer, not a promise; both sides must send Window > Scale options in their SYN segments to enable window scaling in either > direction." > > (From http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc1323) > > > > In your trace, host 63.245.209.93 does not support Window scaling, as > the SYN/ACK that it sends does not have the window scaling option. > Therfore no window scaling will be used and Wireshark displays > non-scaled values. > > > > Hope this helps, > > Cheers, > > Sake > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: Jo Verstraelen <mailto:J.Verstraelen@xxxxxxxxxx> > > To: Community support list for Wireshark > <mailto:wireshark-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Sent: Monday, March 23, 2009 11:58 AM > > Subject: Re: [Wireshark-users] TCP: window scaling > > > > Hi Sake, > > > > Here you go: http://denuitlaat.be/tcp/windowscaled1.pcap . > It shows that a session is started with a SYN and the option ws > is present (ws = 2). The segments following do not show a scaled window > size. > > > > Regards, > > jo > > > > > ________________________________ > > > From: wireshark-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > [mailto:wireshark-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Sake Blok > Sent: maandag 23 maart 2009 11:40 > To: Community support list for Wireshark > Subject: Re: [Wireshark-users] TCP: window scaling > > > > Hi Jo, > > > > The window size should consistently be displayed within one TCP > session. Between sessions, there could be difference, because either > there is no scaling, or the SYN, SYN/ACK were not present in the > tracefile. If that does not explain the differences you see, could you > provide a small capture showing this issue? > > > > Cheers, > > Sake > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: Jo Verstraelen <mailto:J.Verstraelen@xxxxxxxxxx> > > To: wireshark-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > > Sent: Monday, March 23, 2009 11:03 AM > > Subject: [Wireshark-users] TCP: window scaling > > > > Hi, > > > > Is there a reason why sometimes in a connection which > received a window scaler (syn;syn,ack) , the window size is > > shown as "number (scaled)" and sometimes just as > "number" (non scaled) in the next segments. Cause in the last case its > not > > possible to know the exact window size as the window > scale factor is non present in the segments after the syn; syn,ack. > > Kind regards, > > Jo > > > > > > > ________________________________ > > > > ________________________________________________________________________ > ___ > Sent via: Wireshark-users mailing list > <wireshark-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Archives: > http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-users > Unsubscribe: > https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-users > > mailto:wireshark-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe > > > ________________________________ > > > > ________________________________________________________________________ > ___ > Sent via: Wireshark-users mailing list > <wireshark-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-users > Unsubscribe: > https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-users > > mailto:wireshark-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe > > -------------- next part -------------- > An HTML attachment was scrubbed... > URL: > http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-users/attachments/20090323/4ad48d22/attachment.htm > > ------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > Wireshark-users mailing list > Wireshark-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > https://wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-users > > > End of Wireshark-users Digest, Vol 34, Issue 46 > *********************************************** >
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [Wireshark-users] text2pcap_windowsXP
- From: wsgd
- Re: [Wireshark-users] text2pcap_windowsXP
- Prev by Date: Re: [Wireshark-users] TCP: window scaling
- Next by Date: Re: [Wireshark-users] what is the upper limit of buffer size?
- Previous by thread: Re: [Wireshark-users] TCP: window scaling
- Next by thread: Re: [Wireshark-users] text2pcap_windowsXP
- Index(es):