Wireshark-users: Re: [Wireshark-users] DNS Working but can't connect to anything
From: John Mason Jr <john.mason.jr@xxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2009 19:29:49 -0500
staedtlerx wrote:
@Sake: Yes, I always tested with all other adapters disabled. I will try to send capture info. Are attachments koshers here or should I upload it somewhere?Might look at settings for Anti Virus or anti malware software as well as firewall software@Frank:: I will look into this, thank you@John: It does seems like that and I know that firewalls can target specific network adapters but I don't have any firewall running that I know of. I've tested in safe mode as well, which would hopefully disable any firewalls. But AFAICT, I've disabled anything that might be acting as a firewall
John
On Sun, Jan 25, 2009 at 5:34 PM, John Mason Jr <john.mason.jr@xxxxxxx <mailto:john.mason.jr@xxxxxxx>> wrote:staedtlerx wrote: > Hello All, > > I thank you ahead of time if you read all this - I'm having a very > strange network problem and someone recommended Wireshark for > debugging it - and it's quite amazing! It's provided some insight but > I am not that familiar with low-level TCP/IP stuff so I don't know > what to make of it all. I was hoping someone could provide some more > insight or any hints for further debugging. > > I am using a Sony Vaio Laptop with Windows XP SP2. It has internal > WiFi, which works fine; Goes on the internet, etc. I'm sending this > email with it right now. I have 4 other ways of connecting the laptop > to the internet: 2 PCMCIA wifi cards and 2 wired ethernet connections. > These 4 other connections all behave exactly the same: They *appear* > to not have DNS (more on that later) and and they cannot access any > remove server by hostname. They CAN access any remote server by IP > address e.g. can browse to http://74.125.45.100 but not > http://google.com. However, they CAN access remote server by name if I > put an entry in my hosts file. This would lead most people to believe > that my DNS is not working correctly. I also get "Ping request could > not find host" when trying to ping a hostname. Again, would make you > think DNS was not working. However, the problem is not that simple. > All 5 connections have the same gateway, dns, etc - yet the internal > wifi works and the 4 others don't. I've tried every sort of winsock > reset, reinstalling, dns cache clearing, etc. I've tried driver > upgrades, downgrades, etc. I've tried everything in safe mode. I've > tried connecting my laptop to my cable modem directly and I've also > tried through my Wifi router. The problem definitely lies within my > Windows software - not hardware, router, firewall, or ISP. The monkey > wrench is that I have the one internal wifi connection thats works! > > Now, more on the part about *appearing* not to have DNS: I figured > something, somewhere, was messing with my DNS (lord knows why on only > 4/5 connections). This is when I got Wireshark for some deeper > insight. Snooping with Wireshark, I can see that hostnames actually DO > resolve to their IP. I can see a response from my gateway with the IP > address then I get an ICMP failure "Destination Unreachable": > > 192.168.0.2 -> 192.168.0.1 - DNS Standard query A google.com <http://google.com> > <http://google.com> > 192.168.0.1 -> 192.168.0.2 - DNS Standard query response A > 72.14.205.100 A 74.125.45.100 A 209.85.171.100 > 192.168.0.2 -> 192.168.0.1 - ICMP Destination unreachable (Port > unreachable) > > Stange thing is that when pining, it shows no sign of the hostname > ever getting resolved: > > c:\>ping google.com <http://google.com> <http://google.com> > Ping request could not find host google.com <http://google.com> <http://google.com>. > Please check the name and try again. > > > When pinging from the WORKING connection, instead of the ICMP failure, > I get: > > 192.168.0.2 -> 192.168.0.1 - DNS Standard query A google.com <http://google.com> > <http://google.com> > 192.168.0.1 -> 192.168.0.2 - DNS Standard query response A > 72.14.205.100 A 74.125.45.100 A 209.85.171.100 > 192.168.0.2 -> 72.14.205.100 - ICMP Echo (ping) request > etc > > > I'm looking for insight into what "Destination unreachable" means > exactly, where the message from (laptop or remote host), and leads on > more research. > ANY insight would be most helpful. However, please skip over the basic > "ipconfig" debugging please - I've been going through that for over a > week. > > Thank you! > Looks like a firewall is blocking the response from the gateway John ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-users mailing list <wireshark-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <https://mail.google.com/a/unformatt.com/mail?view=cm&tf=0&to=wireshark-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-users Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-users mailto:wireshark-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <https://mail.google.com/a/unformatt.com/mail?view=cm&tf=0&to=wireshark-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>?subject=unsubscribe ------------------------------------------------------------------------ ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-users mailing list <wireshark-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-users Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-users mailto:wireshark-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe
- References:
- [Wireshark-users] DNS Working but can't connect to anything
- From: staedtlerx
- Re: [Wireshark-users] DNS Working but can't connect to anything
- From: John Mason Jr
- Re: [Wireshark-users] DNS Working but can't connect to anything
- From: staedtlerx
- [Wireshark-users] DNS Working but can't connect to anything
- Prev by Date: Re: [Wireshark-users] DNS Working but can't connect to anything
- Next by Date: Re: [Wireshark-users] DNS Working but can't connect to anything
- Previous by thread: Re: [Wireshark-users] DNS Working but can't connect to anything
- Next by thread: Re: [Wireshark-users] DNS Working but can't connect to anything
- Index(es):