Wireshark-users: Re: [Wireshark-users] [This frame is a (suspected) retrasmission]
Date: Sat, 10 Jan 2009 17:39:39 +0100
Boaz Galil ha scritto:
From what I understand you are looking at a TCP socket – one of the nodes didn't get acknowledge for a segment so now you are observing retransmission.If you provide the entire packet capture – maybe we can give more information about the possible RCA.Thanks in advance,
Hi, the following is the entire packet:No. Time Source Destination Protocol Info 77 6.272751 192.168.1.2 213.239.204.205 TCP [TCP Retransmission] [TCP segment of a reassembled PDU]
Frame 77 (1506 bytes on wire, 1506 bytes captured) Arrival Time: Jan 9, 2009 19:17:35.306192000 [Time delta from previous captured frame: 0.117051000 seconds] [Time delta from previous displayed frame: 0.117051000 seconds] [Time since reference or first frame: 6.272751000 seconds] Frame Number: 77 Frame Length: 1506 bytes Capture Length: 1506 bytes [Frame is marked: False] [Protocols in frame: eth:ip:tcp] [Coloring Rule Name: Bad TCP] [Coloring Rule String: tcp.analysis.flags]Ethernet II, Src: Apple_ba:30:0f (00:1c:b3:ba:30:0f), Dst: Industri_b4:30:8f (00:17:37:b4:30:8f)
Destination: Industri_b4:30:8f (00:17:37:b4:30:8f) Address: Industri_b4:30:8f (00:17:37:b4:30:8f).... ...0 .... .... .... .... = IG bit: Individual address (unicast) .... ..0. .... .... .... .... = LG bit: Globally unique address (factory default)
Source: Apple_ba:30:0f (00:1c:b3:ba:30:0f) Address: Apple_ba:30:0f (00:1c:b3:ba:30:0f).... ...0 .... .... .... .... = IG bit: Individual address (unicast) .... ..0. .... .... .... .... = LG bit: Globally unique address (factory default)
Type: IP (0x0800)Internet Protocol, Src: 192.168.1.2 (192.168.1.2), Dst: 213.239.204.205 (213.239.204.205)
Version: 4 Header length: 20 bytes Differentiated Services Field: 0x00 (DSCP 0x00: Default; ECN: 0x00) 0000 00.. = Differentiated Services Codepoint: Default (0x00) .... ..0. = ECN-Capable Transport (ECT): 0 .... ...0 = ECN-CE: 0 Total Length: 1492 Identification: 0x3bf4 (15348) Flags: 0x04 (Don't Fragment) 0... = Reserved bit: Not set .1.. = Don't fragment: Set ..0. = More fragments: Not set Fragment offset: 0 Time to live: 64 Protocol: TCP (0x06) Header checksum: 0x94c8 [correct] [Good: True] [Bad : False] Source: 192.168.1.2 (192.168.1.2) Destination: 213.239.204.205 (213.239.204.205)Transmission Control Protocol, Src Port: 46985 (46985), Dst Port: http (80), Seq: 5761, Ack: 1, Len: 1440
Source port: 46985 (46985) Destination port: http (80) Sequence number: 5761 (relative sequence number) [Next sequence number: 7201 (relative sequence number)] Acknowledgement number: 1 (relative ack number) Header length: 32 bytes Flags: 0x18 (PSH, ACK) 0... .... = Congestion Window Reduced (CWR): Not set .0.. .... = ECN-Echo: Not set ..0. .... = Urgent: Not set ...1 .... = Acknowledgment: Set .... 1... = Push: Set .... .0.. = Reset: Not set .... ..0. = Syn: Not set .... ...0 = Fin: Not set Window size: 5840 (scaled) Checksum: 0x8308 [correct] [Good Checksum: True] [Bad Checksum: False] Options: (12 bytes) NOP NOP Timestamps: TSval 7689054, TSecr 3979016312 [SEQ/ACK analysis] [TCP Analysis Flags] [This frame is a (suspected) retransmission] [The RTO for this segment was: 3.838753000 seconds] [RTO based on delta from frame: 39] TCP segment data (1440 bytes)I removed the byte packet because I have the same problem to send "big" email.
Thx a lot for any hint.
- References:
- [Wireshark-users] [This frame is a (suspected) retrasmission]
- From: bbbluedefense@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: [Wireshark-users] [This frame is a (suspected) retrasmission]
- From: Boaz Galil
- [Wireshark-users] [This frame is a (suspected) retrasmission]
- Prev by Date: Re: [Wireshark-users] [This frame is a (suspected) retrasmission]
- Next by Date: Re: [Wireshark-users] capture Q931 protocol
- Previous by thread: Re: [Wireshark-users] [This frame is a (suspected) retrasmission]
- Next by thread: [Wireshark-users] capture Q931 protocol
- Index(es):