Wireshark-users: Re: [Wireshark-users] Why so much SMB traffic?
From: "John Trumbell" <JTrumbell@xxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2008 12:07:54 -0500
This is from the Microsoft Knowledge article MS uses the same ports for a a lot of different processes. So for example Printing uses some of these ports. Hope this helps Here's the link http://support.microsoft.com/kb/832017/en-us Remote Procedure Call (RPC) The Remote Procedure Call (RPC) system service is an interprocess communication (IPC) mechanism that enables data exchange and invocation of functionality that reside in a different process. The different process can be on the same computer, on the LAN, or in a remote location, and can be accessed over a WAN connection or over a VPN connection. The RPC service serves as the RPC endpoint mapper and Component Object Model (COM) Service Control Manager. Many services depend on the RPC service to start successfully. System service name: RpcSsApplication protocol Protocol Ports RPC TCP 135 RPC over HTTPS TCP 593 NetBIOS Datagram Service UDP 138 NetBIOS Name Resolution UDP 137 NetBIOS Session Service TCP 139 SMB TCP 445 John -----Original Message----- From: wireshark-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:wireshark-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Jeff - Sent: Monday, November 10, 2008 4:36 PM To: wireshark-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: [Wireshark-users] Why so much SMB traffic? Our network uses a Windows 2003 server as our file server. Has a basic shared folder and users map it to their machine. Using Wireshark I'm seeing tons of activity like the following: No. Time SRC DST Protocol INFO 10956 59.354649 192.168.143.23 192.168.143.1 SMB Trans2 Request, QUERY_PATH_INFO, Query File Basic Info, Path: \steve 10957 59.354750 192.168.143.1 192.168.143.23 SMB Trans2 Response, QUERY_PATH_INFO 10958 59.355077 192.168.143.23 192.168.143.1 SMB Trans2 Request, FIND_FIRST2, Pattern: \steve\TM_CFW.sys 10959 59.355306 192.168.143.1 192.168.143.23 SMB Trans2 Response, FIND_FIRST2, Error: STATUS_NO_SUCH_FILE The user and files vary. Many users seem to be always searching for files on the file server which do not exist. The files it looks for seems like "system" files and is never files that are on our file server. Anyone know what this could mean and/or what could be causing this? = Trend Micro oem software Secure your home network against online threats - Free Download. http://a8-asy.a8ww.net/a8-ads/adftrclick?redirectid=ea524f6bfc6d25b5695b ca42dd6f3d8c -- Powered by Outblaze _______________________________________________ Wireshark-users mailing list Wireshark-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxx https://wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-users The information transmitted is intended only for the person(s) or entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. If you are not the intended recipient any review, dissemination, reproduction, printing or other use of any part of this communication is strictly prohibited as is the taking of any action in reliance upon this information. If you received this e-mail in error, please notify us immediately by return e-mail and permanently destroy all copies of this communication. Thank you. Ces informations sont destinées uniquement à la ou aux personne(s) ou à l’entité à laquelle elles sont adressées et peuvent contenir des documents confidentiels ou à accès réservé. Si vous n’êtes pas le destinataire, tout examen, toute diffusion, reproduction, impression ou tout autre usage de cette communication est strictement prohibé, de même que toute action entreprise ayant recours à ces informations. Si vous avez reçu ce courriel par erreur, veuillez nous en aviser immédiatement par retour de courriel et détruire tous les exemplaires de cette communication.
- References:
- [Wireshark-users] Why so much SMB traffic?
- From: Jeff -
- [Wireshark-users] Why so much SMB traffic?
- Prev by Date: Re: [Wireshark-users] How to change the version string
- Next by Date: Re: [Wireshark-users] Why so much SMB traffic?
- Previous by thread: [Wireshark-users] Why so much SMB traffic?
- Next by thread: Re: [Wireshark-users] Why so much SMB traffic?
- Index(es):