PPID==7 does not work in the sense that iti is not decoded , however
filtering on sctp data payload ==7
delivers exactly the packets one would expect and where one would
expect them , so rather weird.
/wbr
Ariel Burbaickij
On Jan 12, 2008 11:41 PM, Anders Broman <a.broman@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi,
> It does on my traces but if H248 is not detected in yours the filter won't
> work. At a glance at the code SCTP port does not work for H.248(not
> implermented(yet)) ppid *should* work.
> Regards
> Anders
>
> -----Ursprungligt meddelande-----
> Från: wireshark-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:wireshark-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] För Ariel Burbaickij
> Skickat: den 12 januari 2008 17:02
> Till: wireshark-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Ämne: Re: [Wireshark-users] h.248 over SCTP
>
>
> Hello Anders,
> glad to see your again,
> I will provide detailed answers on Monday, 14.01.2007 as I am
> away from equipment. However, if I understand the nature of your
> questions correctly -- they imply that there are some limitations.
> Is it correct? How about the fact that filter h248 does not work
> in case of tranfer over SCTP?
>
> /wbr
> Ariel Burbaickij
> On Jan 12, 2008 12:50 PM, Anders Broman <a.broman@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Hi,
> > Traces I have of H.248 over SCTP decodes...
> > Is PPID 7 used? Is it Binary or text?
> > Can you send a small sample trace?
> > Regards
> > Anders
> >
> > -----Ursprungligt meddelande-----
> > Från: wireshark-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > [mailto:wireshark-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] För Ariel Burbaickij
> > Skickat: den 12 januari 2008 11:02
> > Till: wireshark-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > Ämne: [Wireshark-users] h.248 over SCTP
> >
> >
> > Hello all,
> > we use h.248 over SCTP and wireshark behaves in such a way that I at least
> > need your advise as of now I still hesistate to submit bug report.
> > We observe following:
> > 1) It is not possible to filter on h248 or MEGACO filters user needs
> > to enter sctp protocol payload
> > number in order to get the packets of interest.
> > 2) h.248 content is not being decoded properly, also after applying
> > "decode as..." functionality
> >
> > 3) it is not possible to select H.248/MEGACO if decode should be based
> > on port and not on PPID
> >
> > Question: Is all this known bugs/behaviour, do I do something wrong
> > while working with it or should I submit
> > bug report?
> >
> >
> > /wbr
> > Ariel Burbaickij
> > _______________________________________________
> > Wireshark-users mailing list
> > Wireshark-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-users
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Wireshark-users mailing list
> > Wireshark-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-users
> >
> _______________________________________________
> Wireshark-users mailing list
> Wireshark-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-users
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wireshark-users mailing list
> Wireshark-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-users
>
