Sure? Nothing is sure, so maybe I shouldn't have said obviously. (grin)
Actually I've had trouble setting this myself on a 3500 series switch, but
the symptoms are classic - seeing just broadcast traffic is what you
expect on an unmodified switch port. The second link is what I use to
verify I get the syntax right.
Randy Grein
Network Engineer
206-442-5329
Cell 206-947-8226
"Giles Coochey" <gcoochey@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent by: wireshark-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
10/10/2007 07:58 AM
Please respond to
Community support list for Wireshark <wireshark-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To
"Community support list for Wireshark" <wireshark-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
cc
Subject
Re: [Wireshark-users] Understanding what I'm seeing
>
> Obviously the port monitoring is incorrect. Cisco does a great job of
> being inconsistent across their product line (but don't tell that to
the
> layer 3 guys - most insist Cisco can do no wrong as an article of
faith).
Are you sure that the port monitoring is wrong for a 3560?
Maybe I'm missing something.
Giles
_______________________________________________
Wireshark-users mailing list
Wireshark-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-users
- -------------------------
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: The information in this message may be proprietary and/or confidential, and is intended only for the use of the individual(s) to whom this email is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any use, dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by replying to this email and deleting this email from your computer. Nothing contained in this email or any attachment shall satisfy the requirements for contract formation or constitute an electronic signature.
