Wireshark-users: Re: [Wireshark-users] "cut short in the middle of a packet" issue
From: Guy Harris <guy@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 21 May 2007 12:37:04 -0700
Prashanth wrote:

Yes, i stop the trace on the filer before reading the file.

Then there's a bug on the filer; you should report it to NetApp. It might not be writing out the last bufferful of packet data (which means there might be some packets that are *completely* missing from the file).

If wireshark ignores the packet then why doesn't it print the ip_hosts stats? Is that the expected behavior? I normally use the -q because i am more interested in looking at the stats by IP address. When wireshark finds that a packet ( the last one) is cut short, it doesnt print the stats. Is there a way to have it continue to print stats.

You can throw away the incomplete packet at the end - have editcap read the file and write it to another file; it'll print an error, but it'll just copy the complete packets to the output file.

Then read the output file with tshark.