Wireshark-users: Re: [Wireshark-users] Help on Inquiry
From: Sebastien Tandel <sebastien@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2007 02:07:40 +0100
tcpdump is made for you. (see the man page saving in multiple files)

Regards,

Sebastien Tandel
ARAMBULO, Norman R. wrote:
> Hi jeff,
>  
> Thanks for the info, is there a way we can capture such traffic aside from wireshark, then we would dissect it in 
> another box or like capture packets then save it in another file like multiple files before we dissect it. Thanks
>  
> ARAMBULO, Norman R. wrote:
>   
>
>     Hi,
>         
>
>     Actualy we are planning to use wireshark on a large network so we
>     could further study IP Packtes. Can wireshark support our needs.
>     Thanks and more power. 
>
> I'm not sure what you mean by that. Certainly Wireshark is good for
> capturing and analyzing IP packets. However it is NOT good for
> capturing huge amounts of traffic: it's really a protocol analyzer,
> not a traffic analyzer.
>
>
>  
>  
>
>
>
>  "Reality is merely an illusion, albeit a very persistent one."
>
>                                                                                                                
> -- Albert Einstein
>
>  
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wireshark-users mailing list
> Wireshark-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-users
>