Wireshark · Wireshark-dev: Re: [Wireshark-dev] Table 1. Typographic Conventions

[João Valverde <joao.valverde@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

    Assuming you are serious, talking like a normal person would go a
    long way towards getting your point across.
    
    FYI, the documentation source code is here:
    
https://code.wireshark.org/review/gitweb?p=wireshark.git;a=tree;f=docbook;h=e4ea2271d3ec1416a0a8472148fac98b69f098c1;hb=HEAD
    
    It is a community effort. I doubt the monospace vs bold monospace
    typographical convention debacle has anyone worried sick.

On 25/01/20 10:33, Wayne Baby wrote:

To who(m) it may concern,

Please clarify the difference between your monospace and bold monospace typographical conventions as displayed by your examples (or completely change this convention).

There shouldn't be a need for me to elaborate on this observation.  However, I will.

There is no clear distinction between  monospace and bold monospace typographical conventions as displayed by your examples.

Do I have to point out how important this distinction needs to be?  I will.

It is the foundation for all the conventions of your whole document.

I'm sorry if I sound like a smart arse but it just seemed like such a simple requirement that contradicted the incredible intelligence underpinning all your efforts to educate/instruct users of Wireshark.

Please make the distinction obvious,

Wayne

___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Archives:    https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
             mailto:wireshark-dev-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe