On Mon, Feb 19, 2018 at 12:33 PM, Simon Barber via Wireshark-dev
<wireshark-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Can you post the code to gerrit (mark as WIP) so we can see exactly what
> you've done?
Well, it's already there ... have a bug fix though because I got a
capture with block acks (but not HE block acks ...)
It is, of course, mixed in with a lot of other changes:
https://code.wireshark.org/review/#/c/25685
> On Mon, Feb 19, 2018 at 12:13 PM, Richard Sharpe
> <realrichardsharpe@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> Hi folks,
>>
>> In handling 802.11ax Trigger requests I have refactored the handling
>> of block acks.
>>
>> In doing so I have eliminated the distinction between Block Ack
>> Requests and Block Acks in the search filters.
>>
>> They used to be things like 'wlan.bar.blah-blah' and 'wlan.ba.blah-blah'.
>>
>> They are all no just 'wlan.ba.blah-blah'.
>>
>> Does anyone have an opinion on whether or not that is unreasonable?
>>
>> --
>> Regards,
>> Richard Sharpe
>> (何以解憂？唯有杜康。--曹操)
>>
>> ___________________________________________________________________________
>> Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Archives: https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
>> Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
>>
>> mailto:wireshark-dev-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe
>
>
>
> ___________________________________________________________________________
> Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Archives: https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
> Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
> mailto:wireshark-dev-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe
--
Regards,
Richard Sharpe
(何以解憂？唯有杜康。--曹操)
