Den 15 okt 2015 19:43 skrev "Jeff Morriss" <jeff.morriss.ws@xxxxxxxxx>:
>
> On 10/14/15 14:25, Peter Wu wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Oct 12, 2015 at 02:02:18PM -0400, Jeff Morriss wrote:
>>>
>>> But you do raise a good point: I should start doing test compiles of the 2.0
>>> rc on RHEL 6. I hadn't realized my users would have to continue using the
>>> Gtk+ GUI. Too bad...
>>
>>
>> I have started testing with cmake + CentOS 6, it is not doing bad. At
>> least these fixes are needed to fix the build:
>> https://code.wireshark.org/review/10916
>> https://code.wireshark.org/review/11041
>
>
> Funny, I actually didn't have any problems (once I updated my (customized) RPM spec file with some of the changes from master). But rpmbuild is using autotools and building from the source tarball.
>
>
>>>> Speaking of bumping library versions, can we also bump the glib and
>>>> libgcrypt versions? Current versions are glib 2.14 and libgcrypt
>>>> 1.1.92. If we could go to glib 2.28 (Feb 2011) and gcrypt 1.5.0 (Jun
>>>> 2011), it would enable us to use newer functions such as
>>>> g_list_free_full.
>>>
>>>
>>> The glib change is OK for me (for RHEL 6) but it does appear to mean we'd
>>> lose support for all SLES versions; I'd tend to think that would be a bad
>>> thing.
>>
>>
>> I made a mistake, SLES 12 includes glib2 2.38.2, the wiki is now updated
>> to reflect that. For now the minimum gcrypt version is 1.4.2
>> (https://code.wireshark.org/review/11043).
>
>
> So bumping the glib version means we'd lose SLES 11. Given how recent (for an enterprise version) SLES 12 is I'd guess there are still a lot of SLES 11 users out there.
>
>
I'm need to build on SLES11 so please don't break that.
> ___________________________________________________________________________
> Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Archives: https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
> Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
> mailto:wireshark-dev-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe
