Wireshark-dev: Re: [Wireshark-dev] Wireshark-dev Digest, Vol 112, Issue 3
From: mahongroo <mahongtoo@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 4 Sep 2015 08:00:44 +0800
Wireshark-dev
发自网易邮箱手机版
On 2015-09-02 14:38 , wireshark-dev-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Wrote: 发自网易邮箱手机版
Send Wireshark-dev mailing list submissions to
wireshark-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
https://wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-dev
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
wireshark-dev-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
You can reach the person managing the list at
wireshark-dev-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of Wireshark-dev digest..."
Today's Topics:
1. Re: Npcap 0.04 call for test (Pascal Quantin)
2. Re: Npcap 0.04 call for test (Yang Luo)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Message: 1
Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2015 19:57:17 +0200
From: Pascal Quantin <pascal.quantin@xxxxxxxxx>
To: Developer support list for Wireshark <wireshark-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Wireshark-dev] Npcap 0.04 call for test
Message-ID:
<CAGka-80WOuxySPqWLQoFDMSX=gLJ3pdW1Ff_rMNyJUuZYqEYdA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
2015-09-01 17:23 GMT+02:00 Pascal Quantin <pascal.quantin@xxxxxxxxx>:
>
>
> 2015-09-01 3:19 GMT+02:00 Yang Luo <hsluoyb@xxxxxxxxx>:
>
>> Hi Pascal,
>>
>> Thanks for this bug. This bug is because loopback flag in Npcap driver
>> isn't set when the driver is paused and restarted (occurs when system
>> resumes from sleep). I have fixed it.
>> Try lastest installer at:
>> https://svn.nmap.org/nmap-exp/yang/NPcap-LWF/npcap-nmap-0.04-r9.exe
>>
>
> Hi Yang,
>
> thanks for the updated driver. I just tested it on the Windows 7 x64
> laptop that was having BSoD beginning of August and I can happily tell you
> that:
> - it does not crash anymore and WiFi is working fine with Npcap installed
> - loopback interface is still working after a suspend / resume
>
> Thanks for your work and congratulation for your GSoC. I guess (hope?) it
> was considered as being successful :)
>
Hi Yang,
a small glitch I just noticed: you forgot to update the string used by
Wireshark to get Ncap version (as seen in About Wireshark dialog box:). It
reports "Npcap version 0.04 (packet.dll version 1.00), based on WinPcap
version 4.1.3 (packet.dll version 4.1.0.3001), based on libpcap version 1.0
branch 1_0_rel0b (20091008)".
Pascal.
> Pascal.
>
>
>>
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Yang
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Aug 28, 2015 at 4:17 AM, Pascal Quantin <pascal.quantin@xxxxxxxxx
>> > wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> 2015-08-25 12:00 GMT+02:00 Yang Luo <hsluoyb@xxxxxxxxx>:
>>>
>>>> Hi Guy,
>>>>
>>>> Now PCAP_IF_LOOPBACK flag in pcap_if_t struct will be set for "Npcap
>>>> Loopback Adapter" both for DLT_NULL mode and Fake Ethernet mode.
>>>> See Npcap 0.04 r8 at:
>>>> https://svn.nmap.org/nmap-exp/yang/NPcap-LWF/npcap-nmap-0.04-r8.exe
>>>>
>>>> Cheers,
>>>> Yang
>>>>
>>>
>>> Hi Yang,
>>>
>>> I noticed an issue when running Npcap 0.4r8 with DLT_NULL option on my
>>> Windows 10 x64 host. After putting my laptop in standby mode and resuming
>>> my session, when launching Wireshark the Npcap loopback interface is no
>>> more working as expected:
>>> - the capture is no more done with Null/Loopback encapsulation type, but
>>> with Ethernet type using a MAC address 02:00:4c:4f:4f:50
>>> - pinging loopback address is no more captured
>>> - when checking the interface characteristics with Wireshark GTK UI, the
>>> media supported is Ethernet instead of Null/Loopback
>>> Rebooting the PC solves the issue. Any idea on how to investigate this?
>>>
>>> You will find attached th corresponding DebugView log when launching
>>> Wireshark.
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>> Pascal.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ___________________________________________________________________________
>>> Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>> Archives: https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
>>> Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
>>> mailto:wireshark-dev-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>> ?subject=unsubscribe
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ___________________________________________________________________________
>> Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Archives: https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
>> Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
>> mailto:wireshark-dev-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> ?subject=unsubscribe
>>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev/attachments/20150901/49c0ea9a/attachment.html>
------------------------------
Message: 2
Date: Wed, 2 Sep 2015 14:38:19 +0800
From: Yang Luo <hsluoyb@xxxxxxxxx>
To: Developer support list for Wireshark <wireshark-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Wireshark-dev] Npcap 0.04 call for test
Message-ID:
<CAM_tFoZPLA0vMQTDJUS8ObtySNSCXXh1iCNUsg2ChdFjGVUpsg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Hi Pascal,
On Wed, Sep 2, 2015 at 1:57 AM, Pascal Quantin <pascal.quantin@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
>
>
> 2015-09-01 17:23 GMT+02:00 Pascal Quantin <pascal.quantin@xxxxxxxxx>:
>
>>
>>
>> 2015-09-01 3:19 GMT+02:00 Yang Luo <hsluoyb@xxxxxxxxx>:
>>
>>> Hi Pascal,
>>>
>>> Thanks for this bug. This bug is because loopback flag in Npcap driver
>>> isn't set when the driver is paused and restarted (occurs when system
>>> resumes from sleep). I have fixed it.
>>> Try lastest installer at:
>>> https://svn.nmap.org/nmap-exp/yang/NPcap-LWF/npcap-nmap-0.04-r9.exe
>>>
>>
>> Hi Yang,
>>
>> thanks for the updated driver. I just tested it on the Windows 7 x64
>> laptop that was having BSoD beginning of August and I can happily tell you
>> that:
>> - it does not crash anymore and WiFi is working fine with Npcap installed
>> - loopback interface is still working after a suspend / resume
>>
>> Thanks for your work and congratulation for your GSoC. I guess (hope?) it
>> was considered as being successful :)
>>
>
Yes, I have completed the project successfully, and lots of test work from
Wireshark has helped me so much, thanks for all your work too:)
>
>>
> Hi Yang,
>
> a small glitch I just noticed: you forgot to update the string used by
> Wireshark to get Ncap version (as seen in About Wireshark dialog box:). It
> reports "Npcap version 0.04 (packet.dll version 1.00), based on WinPcap
> version 4.1.3 (packet.dll version 4.1.0.3001), based on libpcap version 1.0
> branch 1_0_rel0b (20091008)".
>
This is because that wpcap.dll version string is not updated to 1.00, I
have fixed it and improved the appearance of the installer. Try installer
at:
https://svn.nmap.org/nmap-exp/yang/NPcap-LWF/npcap-nmap-1.00.exe
<https://svn.nmap.org/nmap-exp/yang/NPcap-LWF/npcap-nmap-1.00.exe>
>
>
> Pascal.
>
>
>> Pascal.
>>
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>> Yang
>>>
>>>
>>> On Fri, Aug 28, 2015 at 4:17 AM, Pascal Quantin <
>>> pascal.quantin@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> 2015-08-25 12:00 GMT+02:00 Yang Luo <hsluoyb@xxxxxxxxx>:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi Guy,
>>>>>
>>>>> Now PCAP_IF_LOOPBACK flag in pcap_if_t struct will be set for "Npcap
>>>>> Loopback Adapter" both for DLT_NULL mode and Fake Ethernet mode.
>>>>> See Npcap 0.04 r8 at:
>>>>> https://svn.nmap.org/nmap-exp/yang/NPcap-LWF/npcap-nmap-0.04-r8.exe
>>>>>
>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>> Yang
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Hi Yang,
>>>>
>>>> I noticed an issue when running Npcap 0.4r8 with DLT_NULL option on my
>>>> Windows 10 x64 host. After putting my laptop in standby mode and resuming
>>>> my session, when launching Wireshark the Npcap loopback interface is no
>>>> more working as expected:
>>>> - the capture is no more done with Null/Loopback encapsulation type,
>>>> but with Ethernet type using a MAC address 02:00:4c:4f:4f:50
>>>> - pinging loopback address is no more captured
>>>> - when checking the interface characteristics with Wireshark GTK UI,
>>>> the media supported is Ethernet instead of Null/Loopback
>>>> Rebooting the PC solves the issue. Any idea on how to investigate this?
>>>>
>>>> You will find attached th corresponding DebugView log when launching
>>>> Wireshark.
>>>>
>>>> Cheers,
>>>> Pascal.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ___________________________________________________________________________
>>>> Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>> Archives: https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
>>>> Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
>>>> mailto:wireshark-dev-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>> ?subject=unsubscribe
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ___________________________________________________________________________
>>> Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>> Archives: https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
>>> Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
>>> mailto:wireshark-dev-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>> ?subject=unsubscribe
>>>
>>
>>
>
> ___________________________________________________________________________
> Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Archives: https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
> Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
> mailto:wireshark-dev-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> ?subject=unsubscribe
>
Cheers,
Yang
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev/attachments/20150902/2dc2875c/attachment.html>
------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Wireshark-dev mailing list
Wireshark-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-dev
End of Wireshark-dev Digest, Vol 112, Issue 3
*********************************************
- Prev by Date: Re: [Wireshark-dev] code.wireshark.org down?
- Next by Date: [Wireshark-dev] size_t vs int
- Previous by thread: Re: [Wireshark-dev] code.wireshark.org down?
- Next by thread: [Wireshark-dev] size_t vs int
- Index(es):