Wireshark-dev: Re: [Wireshark-dev] Undissected packet bytes
Date Index · Thread Index · Other Months · All Mailing Lists
Date Prev · Date Next · Thread Prev · Thread Next
From: Evan Huus <eapache@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2015 13:28:21 -0500
I suppose you could add a an expert info, but I think that might be
overkill, most users probably don't care that much. You could just log
it, or dissect it as data, or...

On Wed, Feb 4, 2015 at 11:58 AM, Dario Lombardo
<dario.lombardo.ml@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 4, 2015 at 5:25 PM, Evan Huus <eapache@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> I think you will need to add a function very similar to
>> proto_find_field_from_offset that makes use of
>> proto_tree_traverse_pre_order and tracks which bytes have been "seen"
>> as the traversal proceeds.
>
>
> And how the output could be shown to the user? With expert infos?
>
> ___________________________________________________________________________
> Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
> Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
>              mailto:wireshark-dev-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe