Wireshark-dev: Re: [Wireshark-dev] Git+gerrit status update - 2014-01-14
From: Hadriel Kaplan <hadriel.kaplan@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2014 23:56:40 -0500
Is anyone else having problems with git pushing and the Change-Id? I’ve successfully used it once for pushing, after figuring out to download the commit-msg hook and re-doing my commit. But trying to push two other commits keeps getting the dreaded "ERROR: missing Change-Id in commit message footer” result, even though according to ‘git log’ my commit has a Change-Id at the end. Fwiw, the suggested Change-Id value suggested by gerrit isn’t the same one created by commit-msg hook. The server sends back this: remote: ERROR: missing Change-Id in commit message footer remote: Suggestion for commit message: remote: Merge branch 'master' of ssh://code.wireshark.org:29418/wireshark remote: remote: Change-Id: I822fbedd22746042a4a18f40811a78a4e570bba0 git log shows this: commit 3c98af518ea9c497bada38e4e600977802da9226 Author: Hadriel Kaplan <hadrielk@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Wed Jan 29 23:43:31 2014 -0500 Added dylib and sublimetext file types to be ignored, plus init.lua from root wireshark directory. Change-Id: Ib3910c931da2807d207f4bf2010221422a3bac43 I must be doing something stupid. -hadriel >> On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 4:50 PM, Gerald Combs <gerald@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> The live Gerrit site is up and running at >>> https://code.wireshark.org/review. At this point you should be able to >>> do the following: >>> >>> - Create an account[1]. This includes adding SSH keys, adding >>> OpenID identities, and setting an HTTP password. >>> >>> - Clone the repository anonymously or using your ID: >>> https://code.wireshark.org/review/wireshark >>> ssh://your.username@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx:29418/wireshark >>> https://your.username@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/review/wireshark >>> >>> - Push changes to a Gerrit magic ref[2] (e.g. >>> HEAD:refs/for/master/convert-packets-to-frozen-custard). >>> >>> Please be careful about pushing to non-magic, normal Git refs. It >>> *shouldn't* be possible to do so but if it does happen it could result >>> in a merge conflict. >>> >>> I'm mirroring the Gerrit repository directly from the current git >>> repository, i.e. behind Gerrit's back. This is non-standard but *should* >>> be safe as long as no commits are done on the Gerrit side. >>> >>> Most of the buildbots now check out source code using git. I'll probably >>> have them all migrated in the next day or so. >>> >>> The weekly automatic number update script has been migrated to git. It >>> successfully pushed to the test repository and should push to the live >>> repository this upcoming Sunday. >>> >>> The data for the OUI lookup tool >>> (http://www.wireshark.org/tools/oui-lookup.html) now comes from git. >>> >>> >>> Next steps: >>> >>> - Update make-version.pl. >>> >>> - Update the web site and wiki documentation. >>> >>> - Further Buildbot integration. We should be able to do test builds >>> as part of the review process but that will likely have to wait >>> until after the migration. >>> >>> >>> Questions: >>> >>> When should we schedule flag day? Is two weeks from now (Jan 28) too >>> soon? I don't want to stretch the migration out too long but I also want >>> to give everyone time to get set up and settled in. >>> >>> Is it safe to redirect Git repositories served over HTTP? If so I'll >>> likely redirect http://code.wireshark.org/git/wireshark to >>> https://code.wireshark.org/review/wireshark after the migration. >>> >>> >>> Links: >>> >>> [1]: http://test.code.wireshark.org/review/Documentation/intro-quick.html >>> >>> [2]: >>> http://test.code.wireshark.org/review/Documentation/user-upload.html#push_create >>> ___________________________________________________________________________ >>> Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> >>> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev >>> Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev >>> mailto:wireshark-dev-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe >> ___________________________________________________________________________ >> Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> >> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev >> Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev >> mailto:wireshark-dev-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe > > -- > Joerg Mayer <jmayer@xxxxxxxxx> > We are stuck with technology when what we really want is just stuff that > works. Some say that should read Microsoft instead of technology. > ___________________________________________________________________________ > Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev > Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev > mailto:wireshark-dev-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe
- References:
- [Wireshark-dev] Git+gerrit status update - 2014-01-14
- From: Gerald Combs
- Re: [Wireshark-dev] Git+gerrit status update - 2014-01-14
- From: Evan Huus
- Re: [Wireshark-dev] Git+gerrit status update - 2014-01-14
- From: Joerg Mayer
- [Wireshark-dev] Git+gerrit status update - 2014-01-14
- Prev by Date: Re: [Wireshark-dev] Subversion to Git migration status
- Next by Date: [Wireshark-dev] Gerrit Merge "<gerrit topic>" commits
- Previous by thread: Re: [Wireshark-dev] Git+gerrit status update - 2014-01-14
- Next by thread: Re: [Wireshark-dev] Git+gerrit status update - 2014-01-14
- Index(es):