Wireshark-dev: Re: [Wireshark-dev] r54005 by wmeier for packet-mq.c and packet-mq-pcf.c
Yes,
if it didn't disturb too much people to have such long lines, I will prefer
that you revert this part (hf[] entries reformatting), otherwise I will
follow the majority wishses
-----Original Message-----
From: wireshark-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:wireshark-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Bill Meier
Sent: Friday, December 13, 2013 7:08 PM
To: Developer support list for Wireshark
Subject: Re: [Wireshark-dev] r54005 by wmeier for packet-mq.c and
packet-mq-pcf.c
On 12/13/2013 12:21 PM, RobiOneKenobi wrote:
> Reformat hf[] entries ?
>
> Why, now all seems no more aligned for me, and your reformat also
> left spaces between text and comma.
You're right; I was sloppy about leaving spaces between the text and the
comma. :)
>
> I do not agree with such reformat, as it seems less readable as the
> one I've put in.
>
I made the change because, personally, I find the quite long lines quite
difficult to read when they when they exceed the width of my screen
(which I expect they will do on screens used by many).
> I like to have some parts aligned to an ease of use for to have the
> same length of displayed items.
>
I understand.
> Are there some rules where this is described?
>
>
Not really. I do think readability is relevant; I'm not really a fan of
the old 72 column limit but I do think there should be some limit.
The above notwithstanding, I can revert the hf[] reformatting if you
desire.....
Bill
___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
mailto:wireshark-dev-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe
