Wireshark · Wireshark-dev: Re: [Wireshark-dev] [Wireshark-commits] rev 53827: /trunk/epan/ /trunk/epan/dissectors/: packet-ip.c

[Joerg Mayer <jmayer@xxxxxxxxx>]

Just trying to understand what is going on here:
Isn't UNICODE a bit to broad a name here? Wouldn't STR_UTF8 be a better
name as there are different unicode encodings around?

Thanks
   Jörg

On Sat, Dec 07, 2013 at 03:48:36PM +0000, darkjames@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> http://anonsvn.wireshark.org/viewvc/viewvc.cgi?view=rev&revision=53827
> 
> User: darkjames
> Date: 2013/12/07 03:48 PM
> 
> Log:
>  Drop proto_tree_add_unicode_string() from IP, IPv6, JSON dissectors.
>  
>  Set .display to STR_UNICODE (instead of STR_ASCII).
> 
> Directory: /trunk/epan/dissectors/
>   Changes    Path             Action
>   +18 -18    packet-ip.c      Modified
>   +18 -18    packet-ipv6.c    Modified
>   +2 -2      packet-json.c    Modified
> 
> Directory: /trunk/epan/
>   Changes    Path          Action
>   +4 -0      proto.c       Modified
> 
> ___________________________________________________________________________
> Sent via:    Wireshark-commits mailing list <wireshark-commits@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-commits
> Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-commits
>              mailto:wireshark-commits-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe

-- 
Joerg Mayer                                           <jmayer@xxxxxxxxx>
We are stuck with technology when what we really want is just stuff that
works. Some say that should read Microsoft instead of technology.