Checking out a new working copy of the internal branch seems to have fixed it...still weird as I think I cleaned everything.
Regards
Anders
-----Original Message-----
From: wireshark-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:wireshark-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Anders Broman
Sent: den 7 juli 2013 23:04
To: Developer support list for Wireshark
Subject: Re: [Wireshark-dev] Build problem in private branch
-----Original Message-----
From: wireshark-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:wireshark-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Guy Harris
Sent: den 7 juli 2013 22:58
To: Developer support list for Wireshark
Subject: Re: [Wireshark-dev] Build problem in private branch
On Jul 7, 2013, at 1:44 PM, Anders Broman <anders.broman@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> This have been driving me nuts today, I can build Wireshark from trunk
> but not my private tree which is made by copying Wireshark/trunk files into a separate svn dir Masking out some files.
> capture_dlg.c(1279) : error C2220: warning treated as error - no
> 'object' file generated
> capture_dlg.c(1279) : warning C4020: 'capture_get_if_capabilities' :
> too many actual parameters
> capture_dlg.c(1410) : warning C4020: 'capture_interface_list' : too
> many actualparameters
> capture_dlg.c(5301) : warning C4020: 'capture_start' : too many actual
> parameters
In your private branch, are capture.h and capture_ifinfo.h at rev 50188 or greater? Rev 50188 added a parameter to capture_start(), capture_get_if_capabilities(), and capture_interface_list():
Yes it is, but somehow that change does not seem to be picked up, or? Which is weird as I have rebuilt from scratch many times...ARGH
------------------------------------------------------------------------
r50188 | lego | 2013-06-27 10:10:50 -0700 (Thu, 27 Jun 2013) | 8 lines
get main_window_update out of the way... pass an update_cb to the capture_sync stuff
... as per the XXX comment removed from tshark.c this was a mess to keep the linker
happy... I couldn't!
I did this without even understanding whether calling main_window_update was realy
necessary in most cases. I guess nothing or more specific update cbs would be best.
___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
mailto:wireshark-dev-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe
___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
mailto:wireshark-dev-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe
