Wireshark · Wireshark-dev: Re: [Wireshark-dev] make rpm-package fails if uic isn't installed.

[Jeff Morriss <jeff.morriss.ws@xxxxxxxxx>]

On 06/26/13 13:58, Christopher Maynard wrote:
> Christopher Maynard <Christopher.Maynard@...> writes:
>
> > Jeff Morriss <jeff.morriss.ws <at> ...> writes:
> >
> > > Yes, unfortunately that's expected.
> >
> > OK, "yum update qt-devel" it is then.
>
> Of course, that should have read, "yum install qt-devel".
>
> I have another rpm-package problem.  I am building an rpm without Wireshark
> (i.e., --enable-wireshark=no), as this is to be installed on headless
> servers w/out any of the GUI-related packages required for Wireshark.
> Basically, it's for the command-line tools only.  Because of this, I get the
> following RPM build errors:
>
>      File not found:
> /home/ricie/wireshark/tshark-1.10.0/packaging/rpm/BUILDROOT/wireshark-
> 1.10.0-1.x86_64/usr/local/bin/wireshark
>      File not found by glob:
> /home/ricie/wireshark/tshark-1.10.0/packaging/rpm/BUILDROOT/wireshark-
> 1.10.0-1.x86_64/usr/local/share/man/man1/wireshark.*
> make: *** [rpm-package] Error 1

Does your compile server have GTK, etc.?

The RPM stuff is currently set up to assume that it does and then 
generate 2 packages: one without the GUI ("wireshark") and one with the 
GUI ("wireshark-gnome", I hope to soon add "wireshark-qt" as another 
package).  If you can compile with GTK then you could simply install the 
first package.

If not, you'd probably have to comment out the entire "gnome" package 
(all the sections matching "^%.* gnome").

I'm not sure if it would be worth making it an option to not generate 
the GUI packages at all--let me know what you think.