Yes David,
Tyson is right... that does sound like a pretty interesting dissector! Go ahead !
On Sat, Feb 2, 2013 at 10:33 PM, Tyson Key
<tyson.key@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hi David,
That sounds like a pretty interesting dissector, to me. In order to kick-start the contribution process, I recommend doing the following:
- Registering at http://bugs.wireshark.org
- Converting your code into a "build-in" dissector (a relatively trivial process that involves removing the plug-in configuration source file, checking the use of certain APIs, and then modifying /epan/dissectors/Makefile.common, and /epan/CMakeLists.txt)
- Generating an SVN Diff-style patch, after placing your new source files in /epan/dissectors
- Filing a new bug at Bugs.Wireshark.org -taking care to attach your patch, and preferably a trace file that exercises it
I hope that helps.
Thanks,
Tyson.
--
Fight Internet Censorship! http://www.eff.org
http://vmlemon.wordpress.com | Twitter/FriendFeed/Skype: vmlemon | 00447934365844
___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
mailto:wireshark-dev-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe