Wireshark-dev: Re: [Wireshark-dev] [Wireshark-commits] rev 40877: /trunk/epan/dissectors/ /trun
Hi,
On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 8:20 AM, Joerg Mayer
<jmayer@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Mon, Feb 06, 2012 at 04:36:23PM +0000, alagoutte@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> http://anonsvn.wireshark.org/viewvc/viewvc.cgi?view=rev&revision=40877
>
> From https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6704
> DNS KEY RDATA contains an extra "Key id" field
>
> Set Key Id is a generated item (in KEY and DNSKEY dns types)
>
> Directory: /trunk/epan/dissectors/
> Changes Path Action
> +6 -4 packet-dns.c Modified
Just looking at the checkin url made me a bit unhappy. Just look at this:
I'm unhappy too...
jmayer@egg:~/work/wireshark/svn/trunk/epan/dissectors> perl -ne '/(proto_tree_add_[a-z]+)/ && print "$1\n"' packet-dns.c | sort | uniq -c | sort -nr
156 proto_tree_add_text
45 proto_tree_add_item
21 proto_tree_add_uint
9 proto_tree_add_string
3 proto_tree_add_boolean
2 proto_tree_add_protocol
1 proto_tree_add_time
So more than half of all the stuff is added by using proto_tree_add_text.
As long as the ratio is that way, people are likely to continue using it
inside this dissector.
Any volunteer(s) to get this down to some sane level by replacing it by
proto_tree_add_item and adding hf_ entries where possible to make these
Elements filterable?
I will see if i have time to update the DNS dissector...
Should something like the above check be added to one of the check scripts
to complain if the add_text percentage is above 10% or so?
Good idea !
Thanks
Jörg
--
Joerg Mayer <jmayer@xxxxxxxxx>
We are stuck with technology when what we really want is just stuff that
works. Some say that should read Microsoft instead of technology.
___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
mailto:wireshark-dev-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe
