Wireshark-dev: Re: [Wireshark-dev] misleading description on Wireshark Download page
It's easy enough to disable the "Development Release" section of the
download widget until a development snapshot or release candidate is
ready. We could also replace the download list with a link to
http://www.wireshark.org/download/automated/ but that would require a
bit of navigation on the part of the user.
On 11/7/11 8:39 AM, Jaap Keuter wrote:
>
> It seems as if the model of 'just hold off the new development release
> until That New Feature(sm) (the next best thing after sliced bread) is
> in' doesn't really work.
> Like you said we opted to wait for the multi-interface capture to be in,
> and even though Irene is working hard on it, it hasn't materialized in
> solid form just yet.
>
> In practice the development release becomes stale as soon as the next
> branch comes out, and remain so until the next one is about to come along.
> So what to do? I say, remove the development pane with a new branch, and
> restore it once we have really something new to show, like a genuine RC.
> In the mean time, development builds (at the bleeding edge) remain
> available, so for the persistent ones there's always new stuff available.
>
> Gerald, I know this makes your release TODO list yet another item
> longer, something you don't like. I am sorry about that, maybe I've got
> some suggestions about that later.
>
> Thanks,
> Jaap
>
> On Wed, 02 Nov 2011 10:07:44 -0700, Gerald Combs wrote:
>
>> Excellent question. We were holding off on making a development release
>> over the summer until the multi-interface capture support settled down.
>> Is there any reason to delay 1.7.0 at this point?
>>
>> On 11/2/11 12:51 AM, Dirk Jagdmann wrote:
>>
>>> So today somebody at my company wanted to check the latest Wireshark.
>>> Looking at http://www.wireshark.org/download.html [1] he read the
>>> description literally which said that the 1.6.0rc2 is the latest
>>> development release. So he figured it might be newer than the fresh
>>> 1.6.3 release... I think we can remove that old release candidate, or
>>> alternatively put a daily/weekly tarball of trunk on that page. --->
>>> Dirk Jagdmann ^ doj / cubic ----> http://cubic.org/~doj [2] ----->
>>> http://llg.cubic.org [3]
>>>
>>
>
> ___________________________________________________________________________
> Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
> Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
> mailto:wireshark-dev-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe
