Wireshark-dev: Re: [Wireshark-dev] Is it still ok to create hidden items ?
From: Jeff Morriss <jeff.morriss.ws@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2011 09:34:42 -0400
Teto wrote:
Hi,

Just had a question about what's the best practice. I have a packet
with a field contianing several keywords. I intend to split those
keywords so that one can filter display based upon a keyword.
My problem is am compelled to display each keyword separately (one
itemp per kewyord and group them in a subtree) or could I display all
of them in one item in the main tree (my preference) and then create
several hidden fields (one per keyword). I wonder if that last

Why not combine the two? Put one item (or maybe even just a text entry--from proto_tree_add_text()) with all the keywords (possibly added with proto_tree_append_text()) and then create a subtree below that with each keyword individually?

This is how we get, for example, nice summary lines for the TCP protocol (including port numbers, etc.) while keeping the port numbers themselves as separate filterable items in the TCP subtree.