Wireshark · Wireshark-dev: Re: [Wireshark-dev] updated patch file for bug 5531

Wireshark-dev: Re: [Wireshark-dev] updated patch file for bug 5531

From: Guy Harris <guy@xxxxxxxxxxxx>

Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2011 12:37:11 -0700

On Oct 7, 2011, at 9:48 AM, Ed Beroset wrote:

> Based on the current discussion about the use of the format field for proto_tree_add_item(), I have once again revised the patch file for Bug 5531 ( https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5531 ).  It has gotten a lot of votes and was originally submitted over nine months ago.  Is there something else I should do to help get this in the main build?

See comments in the bug.

Is there either a public specification for C12.12 or, at least, an explanation of the part of the protocol responsible for all the ugly stuff in canonify_unencrypted_header()?

References:
- [Wireshark-dev] updated patch file for bug 5531
  - From: Ed Beroset

Prev by Date: Re: [Wireshark-dev] Replace TRUE/FALSE with proper ENC_* in proto_tree_add_item() using a script.
Next by Date: Re: [Wireshark-dev] Replace TRUE/FALSE with proper ENC_* in proto_tree_add_item() using a script.
Previous by thread: [Wireshark-dev] updated patch file for bug 5531
Next by thread: [Wireshark-dev] Wireshnork - A snort plugin for Wireshark - Volunteers needed
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread