What are you talking about? It's Wednesday. Everyone knows that UTF8Strings have indefinite lengths on Wednesdays.
On Dec 15, 2010, at 8:50 AM, Jaap Keuter wrote:
> Hi,
>
> "With the proper use of subtrees the structure of even the most complex
> protocols becomes clear."
> ... and then came ASN.1 ... ;)
>
> Thanks,
> Jaap
>
> On Wed, 15 Dec 2010 17:32:13 +0100, "news.gmane.com"
> <AndreasSander1@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>> "Jaap Keuter" <jaap.keuter@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in
>> message news:75883c052eaf82074dac3aef04d29e94@xxxxxxxxx...
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> This 'colorize' is mainly intended to mark changeover into another
>>> protocol.
>>> Usually you see this at the top level (from the root), but occasionally
>>> when a protocol is encapsulated (some ITU protocols show this).
>>> As long as your 'structures' are at the top level, these could be
>>> considered valid use if they are truly independant, otherwise it's just
>>> poor style.
>>
>> Well the protocol is designed as it is. And I think you agree that it would
>> be an abuse to highlight structure starts similar (but not identically) as a
>> protocol.
>>
>> Does anybody see any other way to help the eyes to find the next structure
>> in a complex packet structure?
>>
>> --
>> Andy
>>
>
> ___________________________________________________________________________
> Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
> Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
> mailto:wireshark-dev-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe
