UE-EUTRA-Capability ::= SEQUENCE {
accessStratumRelease AccessStratumRelease,
ue-Category INTEGER (1..5),
pdcp-Parameters PDCP-Parameters,
phyLayerParameters PhyLayerParameters,
rf-Parameters RF-Parameters,
measParameters MeasParameters,
featureGroupIndicators BIT STRING (SIZE (32)) OPTIONAL,
:
And from the standard:
UE-EUTRA-Capability field descriptions
:
featureGroupIndicators
The definitions of the bits in the bit string are described in Annex B.
This means that asn2wrs will just interpret featuregropIndicators as an opaque bitstring and only pressent it as a value. If we
want to do further dissection of the BIT STRING we have to add code in the .cnf file like this:
#.FN_BODY UE-EUTRA-Capability/featureGroupIndicators VAL_PTR = &featureGroupIndicators_tvb
tvbuff_t *featureGroupIndicators_tvb=NULL;
%(DEFAULT_BODY)s
if(featureGroupIndicators_tvb){
/* Add dissection of featureGroupIndicators here */
}
The featureGroupIndicators_tvb will now contain the featureGroupIndicators and we can add further dissecton buy normal proto_add_item() functions
referencing the featureGroupIndicators_tvb.
I've added the basic code in Committ revision 34032.
Regards
Anders
From: wireshark-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:wireshark-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of ??
Sent: den 31 augusti 2010 10:35
To: wireshark-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [Wireshark-dev] Wireshark-dev Digest, Vol 51, Issue 39
Index of
indicator (bit
number) Definition (description of
the supported functionality, if indicator set to
one‘true’) Notes 1 (leftmost
bit) off -
Intra-subframe frequency hopping for PUSCH scheduled by UL
grant - Extended
cyclic prefix with Δf = 7.5kHz for DL resource block - DCI format 3a
(TPC commands for PUCCH and PUSCH with single bit power
adjustments) - Multi-user
MIMO for PDSCH - Aperiodic
CQI/PMI/RI reporting on PUSCH: Mode 2-0 �C UE selected subband CQI without
PMI - Aperiodic
CQI/PMI/RI reporting on PUSCH: Mode 2-2 �C UE selected subband CQI with
multiple PMI 2 off - Simultaneous
CQI and ACK/NACK on PUCCH, i.e. PUCCH format 2a and
2b - Absolute TPC
command for PUSCH - Resource
allocation type 1 for PDSCH - Periodic
CQI/PMI/RI reporting on PUCCH: Mode 2-0 �C UE selected subband CQI without
PMI - Periodic
CQI/PMI/RI reporting on PUCCH: Mode 2-1 �C UE selected subband CQI with
single PMI 3 off -
Semi-persistent scheduling - TTI
bundling - 5bit RLC UM
SN - 7bit PDCP
SN 4 on - Short DRX
cycle 5 on - Long DRX
cycle - DRX command
MAC control element 6 on - Piroritized
bit rate 7 on - RLC
UM - can only be
set as ‘false’ if the UE does not support
voice 8 off - EUTRA
RRC_CONNECTED to UTRA CELL_DCH PS handover - can only be
set to ‘true’ if the UE has set bit number 22 to
‘true’ 9 off - EUTRA
RRC_CONNECTED to GERAN GSM_Dedicated handover - related to
SR-VCC - can only be
set to ‘true’ if the UE has set bit number 23 to
‘true’ 10 off - EUTRA
RRC_CONNECTED to GERAN (Packet_) Idle by Cell Change
Order - EUTRA
RRC_CONNECTED to GERAN (Packet_) Idle by Cell Change Order with NACC
(Network Assisted Cell Change) 11 off - EUTRA
RRC_CONNECTED to 1xRTT CS Active handover - can only be
set to ‘true’ if the UE has sets bit number 24 to
‘true’ 12 off - EUTRA
RRC_CONNECTED to HRPD Active handover - can only be
set to ‘true’ if the UE has set bit number 24 to
‘true’ 13 on -
Inter-frequency handover - can only be
set to ‘true’ if the UE has set bit number 24 to
‘true’ 14 on - Measurement
reporting event: Event A4 �C Neighbour > threshold - Measurement
reporting event: Event A5 �C Serving < threshold1 & Neighbour >
threshold2 15 off - Measurement
reporting event: Event B1 �C Neighbour >
threshold 16 on - Periodical
measurement reporting for non-ANR related
measurements 17 Off - Periodical
measurement reporting for SON / ANR - ANR related
intra-frequency measurement reporting events 18 Off - ANR related
inter-frequency measurement reporting events 19 Off - ANR related
inter-RAT measurement reporting events 20 On - RB
combination: SRB1 and SRB2 for DCCH + 1x AM DRB + 1x UM
DRB - RB
combination: SRB1 and SRB2 for DCCH + 2x AM DRB + 1x UM
DRB - RB
combination: SRB1 and SRB2 for DCCH + 2x AM DRB + 2x UM
DRB - RB
combination: SRB1 and SRB2 for DCCH + 3x AM DRB + 1x UM
DRB - RB
combination: SRB1 and SRB2 for DCCH + 3x AM DRB + 2x UM
DRB - RB
combination: SRB1 and SRB2 for DCCH + 4x AM DRB + 1x UM
DRB - RB
combination: SRB1 and SRB2 for DCCH + 4x AM DRB + 2x UM
DRB - RB
combination: SRB1 and SRB2 for DCCH + 5x AM DRB + 3x UM
DRB - RB
combination: SRB1 and SRB2 for DCCH + 8x AM DRB - RB
combination: SRB1 and SRB2 for DCCH + 1x AM DRB + 1x UM DRB must be
supported/tested if the UE supports voice 21 Off - Predefined
intra-subframe frequency hopping for PUSCH with N_sb >
1 - Predefined
inter-subframe frequency hopping for PUSCH with N_sb >
1 22 Off - UTRAN
measurements and reporting in E-UTRA connected
mode 23 Off - GERAN
measurements and reporting in E-UTRA connected
mode 24 Off - cdma2000
measurements and reporting in E-UTRA connected
mode 25 On -
Inter-frequency measurements and reporting in E-UTRA connected mode
26 Off Undefined 27 Off Undefined 28 Off Undefined 29 Off Undefined 30 Off Undefined 31 Off Undefined 32 off Undefined
Thanks & Best
Regards
Olina Lee
At 2010-08-29 03:00:02,wireshark-dev-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: >Send Wireshark-dev mailing list submissions to > wireshark-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > >To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > https://wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-dev >or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to > wireshark-dev-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > >You can reach the person managing the list at > wireshark-dev-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > >When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific >than "Re: Contents of Wireshark-dev digest..." > > >Today's Topics: > > 1. buildbot failure in Wireshark 1.2 on Windows-XP-x86 > (buildbot-no-reply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx) > 2. wireshark dissect (??) > 3. Re: wireshark dissect (Anders Broman) > > >---------------------------------------------------------------------- > >Message: 1 >Date: Fri, 27 Aug 2010 17:32:58 -0700 >From: buildbot-no-reply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >Subject: [Wireshark-dev] buildbot failure in Wireshark 1.2 on > Windows-XP-x86 >To: wireshark-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >Message-ID: <20100828003258.935FB544B6@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >Content-Type: text/plain > >The Buildbot has detected a new failure of Windows-XP-x86 on Wireshark 1.2. >Full details are available at: > http://buildbot.wireshark.org/trunk-1.2/builders/Windows-XP-x86/builds/37 > >Buildbot URL: http://buildbot.wireshark.org/trunk-1.2/ > >Buildslave for this Build: windows-xp-x86 > >Build Reason: >Build Source Stamp: 33975 >Blamelist: gerald > >BUILD FAILED: failed nmake setup > >sincerely, > -The Buildbot > > > >------------------------------ > >Message: 2 >Date: Sat, 28 Aug 2010 17:47:45 +0800 (CST) >From: ?? <olinalee@xxxxxxx> >Subject: [Wireshark-dev] wireshark dissect >To: wireshark-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >Message-ID: <154df0c.ec99.12ab8187989.Coremail.olinalee@xxxxxxx> >Content-Type: text/plain; charset="gbk" > > >hello, >I need to dissect every bit of feature group indicator of packet-. But the dissect_per_bit_string can't disset this feild. Can you tell me how to dissect this? > > >-- > > >Thanks & Best Regards > > > >Olina Lee > > >-------------- next part -------------- >An HTML attachment was scrubbed... >URL: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev/attachments/20100828/b31fd7a9/attachment.html > >------------------------------ > >Message: 3 >Date: Sat, 28 Aug 2010 15:04:27 +0200 >From: Anders Broman <a.broman@xxxxxxxxx> >Subject: Re: [Wireshark-dev] wireshark dissect >To: Developer support list for Wireshark <wireshark-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> >Message-ID: <4C79095B.4090405@xxxxxxxxx> >Content-Type: text/plain; charset="x-gbk" > > ???? skrev 2010-08-28 11:47: >> >> hello, >> I need to dissect every bit of feature group indicator of packet-. But >> the dissect_per_bit_string can't disset this feild. Can you tell me >> how to dissect this? >> >You need to be a bit more verbose :-) >Which protocol? what protocol entity(IE)? From the brief description >above I'm assuming that something in the protocol ASN1description is >defined as a PER bitstring then there is some verbal >description or a reference on how this bitstring should be interpreted. >If that's the case you would have to add code in the .cnf file (assuming >this is a protocol dissector generated by asn2wrs) >to extract the bitstring and to dissect it. Adding a feature request to >bugzilla describing the problem and with a example trace might get some >one to pick it up and implement it. >Regards >Anders >> -- >> >> Thanks & Best Regards >> >> * * >> >> */Olina Lee/* >> >> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> ?????????????????????????????? <http://mail.163.com/?from=fe1> >> >> >> ___________________________________________________________________________ >> Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list<wireshark-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> >> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev >> Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev >> mailto:wireshark-dev-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe > >-------------- next part -------------- >An HTML attachment was scrubbed... >URL: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev/attachments/20100828/42ddc0a0/attachment.htm > >------------------------------ > >_______________________________________________ >Wireshark-dev mailing list >Wireshark-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >https://wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-dev > > >End of Wireshark-dev Digest, Vol 51, Issue 39 >*********************************************
您想拥有和网易免费邮箱一样强大的软件吗?
- Follow-Ups:
- References:
- Prev by Date: Re: [Wireshark-dev] Dissection of LTE-RRC
- Next by Date: Re: [Wireshark-dev] Issue with newest stable release / PortableApps installer
- Previous by thread: Re: [Wireshark-dev] Wireshark-dev Digest, Vol 51, Issue 39
- Next by thread: [Wireshark-dev] LTE RRC Feature Group Indicators dissection (was: wireshark dissect -> How to do further dissection of a BIT STRING)
- Index(es):