Wireshark-dev: Re: [Wireshark-dev] Compiling a Dissector
From: wsgd <wsgd@xxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 20 May 2010 18:42:02 +0200
Try to install on target computer : http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?familyid=200b2fd9-ae1a-4a14-984d-389c36f85647&displaylang=en or (if your VS2005 is not SP1) http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?familyid=32bc1bee-a3f9-4c13-9c99-220b62a191ee&displaylang=en Or build with VS2008 (because wireshark 1.2.X is build with VS2008) Olivier Jonathan Walker a écrit :
Thanks for the reply, Stephen (and Jaap). The reason I was asking is because I recently developed a dissector that would successfully compile, provided the necessary wireshark libraries. However, it would only load in Wireshark on machines with VS2005 installed (which is the version of VS I used to build the Wireshark source, and the dissector if it uses the lib as provided in config.nmake (?) ). I have been wondering why a dissector requires libraries from a specific VS in the first place? It doesn't seem necessary. Then again, I probably don't have as deep an understanding of the source as the developers. Or, maybe it's just an issue with compatibility between different Microsoft VS versions? Thanks, J. Walker -----Original Message----- From: wireshark-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:wireshark-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Stephen Fisher Sent: Tuesday, May 18, 2010 7:12 PM To: Developer support list for Wireshark Subject: Re: [Wireshark-dev] Compiling a Dissector On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 09:03:39AM -0700, Jonathan Walker wrote:Is this to say that there is no possible way to compile a dissector that can successfully run with Wireshark, by simply compiling it with all the required libraries provided by the previously-built Wireshark? In other words, can a dissector be updated and re-compiled with the same libraries from a previously-built Wireshark? (only need to build wireshark from source once).The suggestion you quoted is aimed at making sure that you can successfully compile Wireshark in your environment before modifying it. That way, you know that any problems you encounter are from what has been modified. However, you did bring up some good questions. The only "supported" (meaning we'll help you make sure it works) way to build dissectors is to compile them with Wireshark from source and use them in that same build of Wireshark. You can usually take a compiled plug-in and drop it into another installation (same operating system and Wireshark version) and have it work. Sometimes this even works between different minor revisions of Wireshark, but it is *not* guaranteed to work - it could break with any new version. This breakage is usually caused by changes to internal Wireshark dissector structure variables. We don't guarantee that the API (functions used in source code) or ABI (compiled files) will remain the same and functional between Wireshark versions or even different SVN revisions of developer trees of Wireshark. If you are developing a plug-in, you can recompile just the plug-in while in the source tree of the initially built Wireshark code and then reinstall it. If it is a built-in dissector (which is preferred, especially if you're going to share it with everyone for inclusion in Wireshark source code), then you need to recompile at least part of the Wireshark tree. Some of the developers here have ways to just recompile parts of the source tree to speed things up if you're just changing a dissector, but I just recompile the whole thing every time in case I changed something outside of a dissector. -- Steve ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are ShoreTel property, are confidential, and are intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom this e-mail is addressed. If you are not one of the named recipient(s) or otherwise have reason to believe that you have received this message in error, please notify the sender and delete this message immediately from your computer. Any other use, retention, dissemination, forwarding, printing, or copying of this e-mail is strictly prohibited ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe
-- Wireshark Generic Dissector http://wsgd.free.fr
- References:
- [Wireshark-dev] Compiling a Dissector
- From: Jonathan Walker
- Re: [Wireshark-dev] Compiling a Dissector
- From: Stephen Fisher
- Re: [Wireshark-dev] Compiling a Dissector
- From: Jonathan Walker
- [Wireshark-dev] Compiling a Dissector
- Prev by Date: Re: [Wireshark-dev] [Wireshark-users] tshark or dumpcap ring buffer limitations
- Next by Date: [Wireshark-dev] Dissector Recognition
- Previous by thread: Re: [Wireshark-dev] Compiling a Dissector
- Next by thread: [Wireshark-dev] Is it just me? (build error in packet-q708.c)
- Index(es):