Thanks again Guy. I'll use that as the definitive PIMv1 specification.
- Chris
-----Original Message-----
From: wireshark-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:wireshark-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Guy Harris
Sent: Tuesday, January 19, 2010 2:57 PM
To: Developer support list for Wireshark
Subject: Re: [Wireshark-dev] PIM
On Jan 19, 2010, at 11:39 AM, Maynard, Chris wrote:
> Thanks Guy ... but I'm a little confused. I just looked down at
> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-idmr-pim-spec-02 section 4.2,
"PIM
> Fixed Header" and the PIM Ver field indicates "Pim Version number is
2."
> Section 5 of http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-idmr-pim-dm-spec-03
> also indicates the same. Did they bump the version in the draft
before
> PIM became a published RFC ... or is there still some other draft out
> there where "Pim Version number is 1."?
They might've been in the middle of redoing the protocol from V1 to V2,
and not yet given it its own IP protocol number.
ftp://ftp.usc.edu/pub/csinfo/tech-reports/papers/95-599.ps.Z
appears to be the original PIM v1 spec - I've updated the dissector.
(gunzip can uncompress the old "compress" format.)
________________________________________________________________________
___
Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
mailto:wireshark-dev-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: The contents of this email are confidential
and for the exclusive use of the intended recipient. If you receive this
email in error, please delete it from your system immediately and
notify us either by email, telephone or fax. You should not copy,
forward, or otherwise disclose the content of the email.
