Wireshark-dev: Re: [Wireshark-dev] [Wireshark-commits] rev 27500: /trunk/ /trunk/epan/dissector
Date Index · Thread Index · Other Months · All Mailing Lists
Date Prev · Date Next · Thread Prev · Thread Next
From: Joerg Mayer <jmayer@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2009 17:16:17 +0100
On Sun, Feb 22, 2009 at 01:38:29PM +0100, Jaap Keuter wrote:
> It is of little use to keep single file dissectors as plugins. Also little or no 
> development is going into these. In order to cut down the number of plugins 
> these are incorporated into the build in collection.
> What is left is:
> 1. gryphon, as the most senior plugin providing an example for new developers.
>     It is referenced in doc/README.plugins.
> 2. Multiple file dissector plugins (like profinet) are left as they are, since
>     the explicit collection of relevant source files has its pros.

IIRC, the rudp dissector was left in because it was a very simple dissector
that could act as a trivial example on how to implement such a thing.
Maybe you could restore it?
Apart from that: I'm very happy with your move as it slightly accelerates
the build and install processes.

 ciao
      Joerg


-- 
Joerg Mayer                                           <jmayer@xxxxxxxxx>
We are stuck with technology when what we really want is just stuff that
works. Some say that should read Microsoft instead of technology.