Wireshark-dev: Re: [Wireshark-dev] LLRP dissector support
From: "Matt Poduska" <mpoduska.intermec@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2008 13:28:10 -0500
I've run quite a few capture files through fuzz testing over the past 10
months. The dissector seems stable.

Thanks, Matt 

-----Original Message-----
From: wireshark-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:wireshark-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Jaap Keuter
Sent: Thursday, August 14, 2008 1:10 PM
To: Developer support list for Wireshark
Subject: Re: [Wireshark-dev] LLRP dissector support

Hi Paul,

That's great. Please try to get some captures through the fuzztester as
well.

Thanx,
Jaap

Paul Dietrich wrote:
> Jaap,
> 
> Thanks.  I will build and test.  We've got access to many LLRP devices 
> for testing.
> 
> Paul
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: wireshark-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:wireshark-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Jaap Keuter
> Sent: Wednesday, August 13, 2008 1:17 PM
> To: Developer support list for Wireshark
> Subject: Re: [Wireshark-dev] LLRP dissector support
> 
> Hi,
> 
> What you could do is compile your own Wireshark version with this 
> patch included and test the hell out of it. ;) It's 216 kB of source 
> code to review, I'm not sure if anyone can allocate his spare time on 
> it on short notice.
> 
> Thanx,
> Jaap
> 
> Paul Dietrich wrote:
>> Me too!  I can't wait to have this in the production wireshark.  
>> Right now we are relying on a protocol dissector at 
>> http://www.llrp.org/tools/decode.html which is very tedious compared
> to
>> wireshark.  Is there something I can do to help?
>>
>> Regards
>>
>> Paul
>>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: wireshark-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> [mailto:wireshark-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Matt 
>> Poduska
>> Sent: Tuesday, August 12, 2008 10:26 AM
>> To: 'Developer support list for Wireshark'
>> Subject: Re: [Wireshark-dev] LLRP dissector support
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>> I'm just curious if anyone on the Wireshark development team has had 
>> a chance to review this dissector recently. I'm interested to know if 
>> there is anything else I should do to bring it into code compliance.
>>
>> Thanks, Matt Poduska
>>
_______________________________________________
Wireshark-dev mailing list
Wireshark-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-dev