For sure.
There's no problem in allocating a new link type code for BT.
If I remember well, libpcap actually already defines a linktype for BT (i would
need to check). The important thing is defining the frame format used with such
link type.
Have a nice day
GV
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Monday, January 21, 2008 11:30
PM
Subject: Re: [Wireshark-dev] pcap-ng
support
Hi, sorry to hijack the
thread, but does anyone know if there will be a link type code available for
Bluetooth in pcap-ng?
Thanks, Tyson.
On Jan 18, 2008 7:01 AM, Ulf Lamping < ulf.lamping@xxxxxx> wrote:
Gianluca
Varenni schrieb:
> FYI today I tried opening a pcap-ng file with
wireshark rev 24118, and > it sort of worked. > > What
works: > - the first file I opened was a 50+MB file generated with
NTAR. Real > ethernet packets coming from a custom board. Wireshark
opened the > trace without any problem, and the decoded packets made
perfectly > sense. YAY!
Nice!
> > What doesn't work: > - timestamps are
wrong. There are two problems here: > 1. the IDB option for the
timestamp precision is not decoded, and I > was generating timestamps
with nanosecond precision.
No wonder, the corresponding line in the
code says: /* XXX - convert timestamps into nsecs */ ;-)
> 2. timestamps are not in the libpcap fashion
(seconds and > microseconds, or seconds and nanoseconds). It's a
single 64bit > quantity that is split into high and low
32bits. >
The timestamps currently won't work, but shouldn't
be too hard to fix.
I'll have a look ...
Regards,
ULFL
P.S: The FCS is also not decoded, Wireshark will internally
always handle pcapng as: "don't know if FCS is there"
-- Fight Internet Censorship! http://www.eff.org
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Open-Source Community, and Technology Testbed: http://www.house404.co.uk/
_______________________________________________ Wireshark-dev
mailing
list Wireshark-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-dev
|