UPX indicates "very fast decompression", but there's bound to be some time penalty vs. not compressing the executable. Nevertheless, it seems worth doing to me as well - at least trying it out to compare the difference in installation time, space, etc. And if the executable decompresses as fast as it's advertised to, then I'd vote to do it ... but I guess we won't know for sure until we try it out.
- Chris
________________________________
From: wireshark-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxx on behalf of Ulf Lamping
Sent: Sun 11/11/2007 2:17 PM
To: Developer support list for Wireshark
Subject: Re: [Wireshark-dev] PortableApps Wireshark feedback
Graeme Lunt schrieb:
> An hour - wow. Maybe I should add something to the installation wizard
> to indicate that it could take quite a while! PortableApps recommend
> compressing exes/dlls with UPX (http://upx.sourceforge.net/) - but I
> haven't looked at how much of a difference this makes yet.
>
Some time ago, I have played a bit around compressing the Wireshark exe
and dll files, and came to significant compression rates. Can't actually
remember, but it was really worth the extra effort.
Regards, ULFL
-----------------------------------------
This email may contain confidential and privileged material for the
sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review, use, retention,
distribution or disclosure by others is strictly prohibited. If you
are not the intended recipient (or authorized to receive for the
recipient), please contact the sender by reply email and delete all
copies of this message. Also, email is susceptible to data
corruption, interception, tampering, unauthorized amendment and
viruses. We only send and receive emails on the basis that we are
not liable for any such corruption, interception, tampering,
amendment or viruses or any consequence thereof.
<<winmail.dat>>
