Wireshark-dev: Re: [Wireshark-dev] [Wireshark-commits] rev 23352:/trunk//trunk/epan/dissectors/
From: "Kukosa, Tomas" <tomas.kukosa@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 4 Nov 2007 21:54:04 +0100
Hi,
 
I thought it would not be necessary to document it as is was planned just like temporary option for short period till we update all ber dissecors.
The lifetime of this option is longer than I expected but I hope it is near till its end of life.
 
When all BER dissectors can be generated with -X -T I will change their behaviour to default and both will be removed.
 
Regards,
  Tomas
 

________________________________

Od: wireshark-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxx za uživatele Anders Broman
Odesláno: ne 4.11.2007 18:14
Komu: 'Developer support list for Wireshark'
Předmět: Re: [Wireshark-dev] [Wireshark-commits] rev 23352:/trunk//trunk/epan/dissectors/: packet-snmp.cpacket-snmp.h/trunk/asn1/snmp/: Makefile.common snmp.cnf



Hi,
I think -X was "reused" for this purpose and the aim is to make "-X"
The default behaviour once all BER dissectors is regenerated using -X.
Still you're right it should be documented.
Regards
Anders

-----Ursprungligt meddelande-----
Fran: wireshark-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:wireshark-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] För Joerg Mayer
Skickat: den 4 november 2007 17:54
Till: wireshark-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Ämne: Re: [Wireshark-dev] [Wireshark-commits] rev 23352:
/trunk//trunk/epan/dissectors/: packet-snmp.c
packet-snmp.h/trunk/asn1/snmp/: Makefile.common snmp.cnf

On Sun, Nov 04, 2007 at 04:47:36PM +0000, etxrab@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> Log:
>  SNMP with option -X and -T

Hmm, it looks like -X is everything but obsolete - maybe the following
comment shoudl go:
    #if o in ("-X",):
        #    warnings.warn("Command line option -X is obsolete and can
        #    be removed")

Also, -X should get documented in the command line help.

 ciao
     Joerg
--
Joerg Mayer                                           <jmayer@xxxxxxxxx>
We are stuck with technology when what we really want is just stuff that
works. Some say that should read Microsoft instead of technology.
_______________________________________________
Wireshark-dev mailing list
Wireshark-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-dev

_______________________________________________
Wireshark-dev mailing list
Wireshark-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-dev